DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kaiser v. Kaiser, 186 N.W.2d 678.

97 citing documents.

  • Marriage of Katz v. Katz 380 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    See Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173, 180
  • Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of Sand v. Sand 379 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    That the purpose of spousal maintenance is to care for the wife’s needs after divorce, not to provide her with a lifetime profit-sharing plan, Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173 , that, although the maintenance award was 'permanent, Petitioner had an obligation to retrain or rehabilitate herself so as to increase her earning power; that there has not been a substantial change in the financial circumstances of the parties as contemplated by M.S. Chapter 518.64, Subd.
  • Marriage of Winter v. Winter 375 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of Winter v. Winter 375 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See Hellman v. Hellman, 250 Minn. 422, 426 , see also Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173, 180
  • Marriage of Swanson v. Swanson 372 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of Swanson v. Swanson 372 N.W.2d 420 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    July 2, 1985) (citing Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173, 180 , ).
  • Marriage of Johnson v. Van Zee 370 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of Johnson v. Van Zee 370 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173, 180
  • Marriage of Greeler v. Greeler 368 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of Greeler v. Greeler 368 N.W.2d 2 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173, 180-81
  • Webb v. Webb 360 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Webb v. Webb 360 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173
  • In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173, 179 , Peterson v. Peterson, 304 Minn. 578, 580
  • Marriage of Crampton v. Crampton 356 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Marriage of Crampton v. Crampton 356 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    See Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173
  • Marriage of March v. Crockarell 354 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Marriage of March v. Crockarell 354 N.W.2d 42 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Although the Supreme Court looks with favor upon stipulations, particularly in divorce proceedings, Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173 , the court has held that wherever possible, trial courts should determine the issue of division of property with finality.
  • Heaton v. Heaton 329 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1983
  • Heaton v. Heaton 329 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 1983
    But, as we stated in Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173, 182 , “in each case the reference to increased cost of living was in contextual response to other changed circumstances of the parties.” We went on to say that, “[ijncreased cost of living, of course, will in all events be reflected in the family’s actual expenditures, by which the adequac
  • Wiese v. Wiese 295 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1980
  • Wiese v. Wiese 295 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1980
    Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321 , Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348 , Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173
  • Marriage of Mertens v. Mertens 285 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1979
  • Marriage of Mertens v. Mertens 285 N.W.2d 490 Minn. 1979
    Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173 , and Abbott v. Abbott, supra.
  • Abbott v. Abbott 282 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1979
  • Abbott v. Abbott 282 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1979
    Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173
  • Epstein v. Epstein 268 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1978
  • Epstein v. Epstein 268 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1978
    Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321 , Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173
  • Sieber v. Sieber 258 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1977
  • Sieber v. Sieber 258 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1977
    See, Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173 , Kate v. Kate, 234 Minn. 402
  • Byrd v. O'NEILL 244 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1976
  • Byrd v. O'NEILL 244 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1976
    Appellant cites Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173 , for this proposition.
  • Kerr v. Kerr 243 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1976
  • Kerr v. Kerr 243 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1976
    Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173 , Kiesow v. Kiesow, 270 Minn. 374
  • Ramsay v. Ramsay 233 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1975
  • Ramsay v. Ramsay 233 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1975
    We stated in Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173, 180 , : “The fact that the financial rights and obligations of the parties have been fixed in the divorce decree as a result of stipulation is an important consideration restraining, although not controlling, the court’s authority.” See, Kate v. Kate, 234 Minn. 402, 408
  • Anderson v. Anderson 225 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1975
  • Anderson v. Anderson 225 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1975
    LaBelle v. LaBelle, 302 Minn. 98 , Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173 , Hellman v. Hellman, 250 Minn. 422 , Mark v. Mark, 248 Minn. 446
  • Snyder v. Snyder 212 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1973
  • Snyder v. Snyder 212 N.W.2d 869 Minn. 1973
    As we pointed out in Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173 , to justify an increase in alimony there must be a clear showing of an adverse change in the circumstances of the party seeking the adjustment.
  • Wolfgram v. Wolfgram 204 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1973
  • Wolfgram v. Wolfgram 204 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1973
    See, e. g., Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173
  • Rubenstein v. Rubenstein 202 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1972
  • Rubenstein v. Rubenstein 202 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1972
    Botkin v. Botkin, 247 Minn. 25 , Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173
  • Bissell v. Bissell 191 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1971
  • Bissell v. Bissell 191 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1971
    1 It should be *352 noted that a “favorable change in the financial circumstances of the divorced husband, without a proved change in the financial needs of a divorced wife or the children of the parties in her custody, is not sufficient to justify a change in alimony or child support provisions of a divorce decree.” Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173, 174