DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Combs, 195 N.W.2d 176.

41 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
  • State of Minnesota v. Andrew Allen Heidemann Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Andrew Allen Heidemann Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    This court examines the weight and sufficiency of evidence by determining whether the record supports the jury’s verdict that the accused “is guilty of the offense charged.” State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 320
  • State of Minnesota v. Charles Kihanya Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Charles Kihanya Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Rae Flint Minn. Ct. App. 2015
  • State of Minnesota v. Jennifer Rae Flint Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    A conviction may be reversed if we conclude that the fact-finder acted without due regard for the presumption of innocence and the necessity of overcoming that presumption by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.2 State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 320, see State v. Mytych, 292 Minn. 248, 251-52, (“[We] 2 We observe that the evidence presented at trial was direct evidence.
  • State v. Wren 738 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Wren 738 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 2007
    See State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 322 , (concluding that police officer’s testimony that defendant was given Miranda warnings was proper foundation for admission of defendant’s statement to the officer).
  • State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
  • State v. Jobe 486 N.W.2d 407 Minn. 1992
    State v. Carl, 310 Minn. 365, 371 , -97 (1976); State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 322
  • State v. Jackson 469 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Jackson 469 N.W.2d 457 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 321
  • State v. Bauer 471 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Bauer 471 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    See State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 318-21 , -79 (1972) (accomplice in armed robbery was guilty of felony murder although the other robber fired the fatal shot).
  • State v. Formo 416 N.W.2d 162 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Formo 416 N.W.2d 162 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 320
  • State v. Eli 402 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Eli 402 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 321
  • State v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    Circumstantial evidence may support conviction if it “reasonably supports an inference of guilt.” State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 321
  • State v. Race 383 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1986
  • State v. Race 383 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1986
    State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 320 , State v. Norgaard, 272 Minn. 48, 52
  • Shannon v. State 379 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Shannon v. State 379 N.W.2d 205 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317
  • State v. Waukazo 374 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • State v. Waukazo 374 N.W.2d 563 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    See State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 322
  • State v. Serna 290 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Serna 290 N.W.2d 446 Minn. 1980
    State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317, 322 , State v. Beck, 289 Minn. 287, 292 , -84 (1971).
  • State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
    See State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317
  • State v. Vance 254 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Vance 254 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1977
    Cf. State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317
  • State v. Carl 246 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Carl 246 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1976
    State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317 , State v. Watts, 296 Minn. 354
  • State v. Walker 235 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Walker 235 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
    However, in State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317 , it was held not reversible error to admit evidence of the Miranda warning where the defendant did talk to an officer after being given the warnings, and later testified on his own behalf, as here.
  • State v. Roberts 208 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Watts 208 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Watts 208 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1973
    State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317
  • State v. Roberts 208 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1973
    t and added ( 289 Minn. 292 , ): “* * * The potential prejudicial effect, whatever the intent, was to encourage the jury to speculate that defendant had remained silent at the time of his arrest and that he did so because he was guilty; and, additionally, to encourage an adverse inference of guilt from defendant’s failure to testify at the trial.” In a later case, State v. Combs, 292 Minn. 317 , the defendant had talked to an officer after having been given the Miranda warning and later testifie