Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State, Department of Highways v. Schlief, 185 N.W.2d 274.

28 citing documents.

State v. Shifflet 556 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State v. Shifflet 556 N.W.2d 224 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
State, Dep’t of Highways v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461, 463 , -76 (1971).
State v. Spilde 536 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State v. Spilde 536 N.W.2d 639 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
State, Dep’t of Highways v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461, 463 , -76 (1971).
State v. Schauer 501 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State v. Schauer 501 N.W.2d 673 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
State, Dept. of Highways v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461, 463
Parsons v. Commissioner of Public Safety 488 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Parsons v. Commissioner of Public Safety 488 N.W.2d 500 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See State, Dep’t of Highways v. Schlief 289 Minn. 461, 462
Backdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 479 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Backdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 479 N.W.2d 89 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
See State Dep’t of Highways v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461
Wolle v. Commissioner of Public Safety 413 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wolle v. Commissioner of Public Safety 413 N.W.2d 258 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Appellant also argues his refusal was reasonable pursuant to State, Department of Highways v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461, 462
Smisek v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Smisek v. Commissioner of Public Safety 400 N.W.2d 766 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Also on May 29, Smisek filed an amended petition for judicial review, adding the specific assertion that she had pled guilty and that in accordance with State, Department of Highways v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461 , her refusal of testing was reasonable, and asking that her license be revoked under the DWI statute, Minn. Stat. § 169.121 , subd.
Omdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 383 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Omdahl v. Commissioner of Public Safety 383 N.W.2d 720 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Petitioner does not fall within the purview of reasonable refusal as set forth in State, Department of Highways v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461 , where his expressed reason for refusal at the time of the test request was his dislike of the Minneapolis court system and where only later at the Implied Consent hearing did he claim his reason for refusing was his intent to plead guilty to the criminal charge.
Goblisch v. Commissioner of Public Safety 348 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1984
Goblisch v. Commissioner of Public Safety 348 N.W.2d 76 Minn. 1984
That policy was challenged in State, Department of Highways v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461
Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public Safety 247 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1976
Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public Safety 247 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1976
State, Dept. of Highways, v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461, 463
State, Department of Public Safety v. Lang 227 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1975
State, Department of Public Safety v. Mulvihill 227 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1975
State, Department of Public Safety v. Mulvihill 227 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1975
1 Defendants, while stating the legal issue in various ways, all rely on our decision in State, Department of Highways, v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461
State, Department of Public Safety v. Lang 227 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 1975
1 The lower court, relying on our decision in State, Department of Highways, v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461 , rescinded the revocation proceedings subsequently instituted under Minn. St.
State, Department of Public Safety v. Anderson 192 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1971
State, Department of Public Safety v. Anderson 192 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1971
The attention of the parties is called to our decision in State, Department of Highways, v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461
State v. Palmer 191 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1971
State v. Palmer 191 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1971
See, State, Department of Highways, v. Schlief, 289 Minn. 461 , 185 N. W. (2d) 274 .