Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bissell v. Bissell, 191 N.W.2d 425.

32 citing documents.

A23-1981 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
When “a modification decision depends on findings of fact, we apply a clear error standard of review to those findings of fact.” ().
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Lee Christiansen v. Timothy Nels Christiansen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Brenda Lee Christiansen v. Timothy Nels Christiansen, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
App. P. 52.01; (citing rule 52.01 in a maintenance-modification appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Madden v. Madden 923 N.W.2d 688 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bissell v. Bissell , 291 Minn. 348 , , 427 (1971) ; Gessner v. Gessner , , 923 (Minn. App. 1992).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Alexander Mark Martinelli. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Bissell v. Bissel l, 291 Minn. 348, 35 1 n.1, n.1 (1971); Cushing v. Cable, 54 Minn. 6, 8, 55 N.W.
State of Minnesota v. Richard William Reynolds, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Richard William Reynolds, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Found., Inc. v. State, 240 Minn. 143, 145−46, (“[A] fact found by the court, although expressed as a conclusion of law, will be treated upon appeal as a finding of fact.”); see also Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348, 351 n.1, n.1 (1971) (quoting Graphic Arts, 240 Minn. at 145−46, d at 844).
Marriage of Keating v. Keating 444 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Keating v. Keating 444 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348, 351
Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson 435 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Erickson v. Erickson 435 N.W.2d 145 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348, 351
Marriage of Prange v. Prange 437 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Marriage of Prange v. Prange 437 N.W.2d 69 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
See Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348, 351
Marriage of Wagstrom v. Wagstrom 394 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Marriage of Wagstrom v. Wagstrom 394 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348, 351
In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Re the Marriage of Abuzzahab v. Abuzzahab 359 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348, 351
Wiese v. Wiese 295 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1980
Wiese v. Wiese 295 N.W.2d 371 Minn. 1980
Ramsay v. Ramsay, 305 Minn. 321 , Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348 , Kaiser v. Kaiser, 290 Minn. 173
Abbott v. Abbott 282 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1979
Abbott v. Abbott 282 N.W.2d 561 Minn. 1979
Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348
Epstein v. Epstein 268 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1978
Epstein v. Epstein 268 N.W.2d 50 Minn. 1978
E. g., Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348 , Mark v. Mark, 248 Minn. 446
Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co. 259 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1977
Zimmerman Ex Rel. Zimmerman v. Witte Transportation Co. 259 N.W.2d 260 Minn. 1977
Sieber v. Sieber 258 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1977
Sieber v. Sieber 258 N.W.2d 754 Minn. 1977
This approach was at least implicitly followed by our more recent decision in Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348
Ramsay v. Ramsay 233 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1975
Ramsay v. Ramsay 233 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 1975
In every such case discretion must be exercised “cautiously.” Bissell v. Bissell, 291 Minn. 348, 351 , , *323 427 (1971).