Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton, 183 N.W.2d 555.
- First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul 884 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 2016
-
First Baptist Church of St. Paul v. City of St. Paul
884 N.W.2d 355
Minn. 2016
of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274, 279-80
- 110 Wyman, LLC, (A14-1176), Ruby Red Dentata, LLC, (A14-1177) v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota 861 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
110 Wyman, LLC, (A14-1176), Ruby Red Dentata, LLC, (A14-1177) v. City of Minneapolis, Minnesota
861 N.W.2d 358
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274, 280
- City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments Partnership 827 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2013
- American Bank of St. Paul v. City of Minneapolis 802 N.W.2d 781 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-
American Bank of St. Paul v. City of Minneapolis
802 N.W.2d 781
Minn. Ct. App. 2011
of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274, 280 , (quotation omitted).
- Concept Properties, LLP v. City of Minnetrista 694 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
-
Concept Properties, LLP v. City of Minnetrista
694 N.W.2d 804
Minn. Ct. App. 2005
of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274, 281 , (noting that “benefits [from special assessments] are to be measured by increased market value” and the “[mjarket value of a lot may be increased by a potential access to a trunk sewer” (quotation omitted)).
- David E. McNally Development Corp. v. City of Winona 686 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
-
David E. McNally Development Corp. v. City of Winona
686 N.W.2d 553
Minn. Ct. App. 2004
of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274, 281 , -60 (1971), the supreme court rejected the village’s assessment because it had not determined whether nonabutting property was benefited by potential access to the improvement.
- Bisbee v. City of Fairmont 593 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Bisbee v. City of Fairmont
593 N.W.2d 714
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274, 286 , -62 (1971).
- Blankenburg v. City of Northfield 462 N.W.2d 417 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Blankenburg v. City of Northfield
462 N.W.2d 417
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274, 280
- Special Assessment for Maplewood Public Project No. 78-10 v. City of Maplewood 358 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Special Assessment for Maplewood Public Project No. 78-10 v. City of Maplewood
358 N.W.2d 106
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274, 280
- Anderson v. City of Bemidji 295 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1980
-
Anderson v. City of Bemidji
295 N.W.2d 555
Minn. 1980
Accord, Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274, 285
- Southview Country Club v. City of Inver Grove Heights, Dakota County 263 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1978
-
Southview Country Club v. City of Inver Grove Heights, Dakota County
263 N.W.2d 385
Minn. 1978
Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274 , * * Any special assessment which does not meet these requirements is an unconstitutional taking without compensation.
- Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn Park 256 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1977
-
Joint Independent School District No. 287 v. City of Brooklyn Park
256 N.W.2d 512
Minn. 1977
Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274 , State ex rel.
- Hylen v. Owens 251 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1977
-
Hylen v. Owens
251 N.W.2d 858
Minn. 1977
Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274
- Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom 240 N.W.2d 517 Minn. 1976
-
Carlson-Lang Realty Co. v. City of Windom
240 N.W.2d 517
Minn. 1976
Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274 , State ex rel.
- Hartle v. City of Glencoe 226 N.W.2d 914 Minn. 1975
-
Hartle v. City of Glencoe
226 N.W.2d 914
Minn. 1975
Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274
- American Oil Company v. City of St. Cloud 206 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 1973
-
American Oil Company v. City of St. Cloud
206 N.W.2d 31
Minn. 1973
In Quality Homes, Inc. v. Village of New Brighton, 289 Minn. 274 , we reversed the trial court in part for failing to hold that nonabutting property may be assessed for part of the cost of a trunk sewer which would ultimately serve such property.