Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Company, 182 N.W.2d 190.

38 citing documents.

Jarvis & Sons, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL MARINE UNDERWRITERS 768 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Jarvis & Sons, Inc. v. INTERNATIONAL MARINE UNDERWRITERS 768 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Courts are to give terms used in an insurance policy their “plain, ordinary, and popular meaning, so as to effect the intent of the parties.” Ostendorf v. Arrow Ins., 288 Minn. 491, 495
Newberg v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 619 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Newberg v. Commercial Union Insurance Co. 619 N.W.2d 757 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., 288 Minn. 491, 494-95
Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Sentinel Management Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co. 563 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Co., 288 Minn. 491, 495 , (requiring interpretation of insurance contracts according to plain meaning of words).
Lott v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 541 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1995
Lott v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. 541 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 1995
Co., 288 Minn. 491, 494-95
American Commerce Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. 535 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
American Commerce Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co. 535 N.W.2d 365 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Gieser v. Home Indemnity Co. 484 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Gieser v. Home Indemnity Co. 484 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
National City Bank of Minneapolis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 447 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1989
National City Bank of Minneapolis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 447 N.W.2d 171 Minn. 1989
Co., 288 Minn. 491, 494-95 , (“courts will not redraft insurance policies in order to provide coverage where the plain language of the policy indicates that no coverage exists”) (citing Stein v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co., 281 Minn. 287 , ).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Levinson 438 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Suburban National Bank v. Transamerica Insurance Co. 438 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Levinson 438 N.W.2d 110 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Haagenson emphasized that the decision was not contrary to the decision in Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Co., 288 Minn. 491
Suburban National Bank v. Transamerica Insurance Co. 438 N.W.2d 119 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In interpreting a provision of a contract, the court must give the terms “their plain, ordinary and popular meaning.” Columbia Heights Motors, (quoting Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Co., 288 Minn. 491, 495 , ).
Safeco Insurance Co. v. Goldenberg 435 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Safeco Insurance Co. v. Goldenberg 435 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Co., 288 Minn. 491
Bloomquist v. NWNL General Insurance Co. 421 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Bloomquist v. NWNL General Insurance Co. 421 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Co., 288 Minn. 491, 495
Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Outboard Marine Corp. 415 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Outboard Marine Corp. 415 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Company, 288 Minn. 491, 495
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. LaSalle Farmers Grain Co. 394 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co. v. LaSalle Farmers Grain Co. 394 N.W.2d 270 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Stein v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Company, 281 Minn. 287 , Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Company, 288 Minn. 491
Pierce v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 351 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Pierce v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 351 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Co., 288 Minn. 491, 495 , accord Firemen’s Ins.
Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co. 340 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co. 340 N.W.2d 675 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
In interpreting insurance policy language, a court must give the terms “their plain, ordinary, and popular meaning.” Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Co., 288 Minn. 491, 495
Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. Viktora 318 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1982
Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. Viktora 318 N.W.2d 704 Minn. 1982
Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Co., 288 Minn. 491
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 277 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1979
Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. 277 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1979
A finding that plaintiff was injured as he was entering the Gordon truck is not contrary to this court’s decision in Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Co., 288 Minn. 491
Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co. 275 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1979
Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co. 275 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1979
In interpreting the policy language, a court is to give the terms “their plain, ordinary, and popular meaning.” Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Co., 288 Minn. 491, 495
Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co. 268 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1978
Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co. 268 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1978
See, Ostendorf v. Arrow Insurance Co., 288 Minn. 491

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by