Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schore v. Mueller, 186 N.W.2d 699.

25 citing documents.

A minor, by and through her mother and natural guardian, Amber Nelson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(allowing recovery for “the additional injury over and above the consequences which normally would have followed from the preexisting condition absent defendant’s negligence,” provided that plaintiff establishes that a defendant’s negligence caused the aggravation of the condition).
Donald R. Filler v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Donald R. Filler v. Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The defendant is liable for only the “additional injury over and above the consequences which normally would have followed from the preexisting condition absent defendant’s negligence.” Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186, 189
Dickhoff ex rel. Dickhoff v. Green 836 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 2013
Rowe v. Munye 702 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2005
Rowe v. Munye 702 N.W.2d 729 Minn. 2005
Rowe v. Munye 674 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Rowe v. Munye 674 N.W.2d 761 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In evaluating whether the first two sentences of CIVJIG 91.40 are consistent with Minnesota law, the court used as its touchstone its holdings in Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 239 Minn. 276 , and Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186
Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Heine v. Simon 674 N.W.2d 411 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 239 Minn. 276, 280 , see also Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186, 189
Morlock v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. 650 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 2002
Morlock v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. 650 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 2002
239 Minn. 276, 280 , see also Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186, 190 , -02 (1971) (following Nelson).
Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Blatz v. Allina Health System 622 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(concluding that while plaintiff must prove that accident caused injury and aggravated a pre-existing condition, the measure of damages is the pain and disability over and above pre-accident pain and disability); Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186, 189-90 , (concluding that plaintiff entitled to recover proved damages for aggravation of preexisting injury, limited, however, to those damages caused by defendant’s negligence); Nelson v. Twin City Motor Bus Co., 239 Minn. 276, 280 , (concluding that
Kelly v. City of Minneapolis 598 N.W.2d 657 Minn. 1999
Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co. 515 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Albert v. Paper Calmenson & Co. 515 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186, 190
Leubner v. Sterner 493 N.W.2d 119 Minn. 1992
Leubner v. Sterner 493 N.W.2d 119 Minn. 1992
See Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186 , and Bloomquist v. Minneapolis Furniture Co., 112 Minn. 143, 148 , 127 N.W.
Fabio v. Bellomo 489 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Fabio v. Bellomo 489 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186, 189
Leubner v. Sterner 483 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Leubner v. Sterner 483 N.W.2d 518 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186, 189 , Bloomquist v. Minneapolis Furniture Co., 112 Minn. 143, 148 , 127 N.W.
Marshall v. Galvez 480 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Marshall v. Galvez 480 N.W.2d 358 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Schore v. Mueller, 290 Minn. 186, 189