Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Milwaukee Motor Transportation Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation, 193 N.W.2d 605.

26 citing documents.

State v. Owens 930 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Owens 930 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. v. Comm'r of Taxation , 292 Minn. 66 , , 608 (1971) ("It is true that the [parent company] owns [the wholly owned subsidiary's] stock, but that fact does not alter the corporate character of either.
, A17-2080, A17-2081, A18-0015 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co. v. Comm’r of Taxation , 292 Minn. 66, 71
HealthEast v. County of Ramsey 770 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2009
HealthEast v. County of Ramsey 770 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2009
Co. v. Comm’r of Taxation, 292 Minn. 66, 73 , ).
HealthEast v. County of Ramsey 749 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 2008
HealthEast v. County of Ramsey 749 N.W.2d 15 Minn. 2008
Co. v. Comm’r of Taxation, 292 Minn. 66
Gunderson v. Harrington 632 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2001
US West Communications, Inc. v. City of Tucson 11 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 465 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Transamerica Insurance Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. 465 N.W.2d 713 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Milwaukee Motor Transportation Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation, 292 Minn. 66, 71 , (“[a corporation] owns its own property, and it must answer for its own contractual obligations”).
City of Prescott v. Town of Chino Valley 790 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Soo Line Railroad v. Commissioner of Revenue 377 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 1985
Soo Line Railroad v. Commissioner of Revenue 377 N.W.2d 453 Minn. 1985
Taxing measures violate the uniformity clause when “the same property or person is taxed twice for the same purpose for the same taxing period by the same taxing authority without taxing all property and persons in the same class a second time.” Milwaukee Motor Transportation Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation, 292 Minn. 66, 77
Erie Mining Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue 343 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1984
Erie Mining Co. v. Commissioner of Revenue 343 N.W.2d 261 Minn. 1984
As this court has explicated, “[djouble taxation is objectionable in a legal sense only when the same property or person is taxed twice for the same purpose for the same taxing period by the same taxing authority without taxing all property and persons in the same class a second time.” Milwaukee Motor Transportation Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation, 292 Minn. 66, 77 , citing State v. Railway Express Agency, Inc., 210 Minn. 556, 567 , 299 N.W.
Lake Havasu City v. Mohave County 675 P.2d 1371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Miami Copper Co. Division, Tennessee Corp. v. State Tax Commission 589 P.2d 24 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Commissioner 259 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1977
Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Commissioner 259 N.W.2d 596 Minn. 1977
of Taxation, 292 Minn. 66, 75
Community Hospital Linen Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 245 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1976
Community Hospital Linen Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 245 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1976
of Taxation, 292 Minn. 66 , impliedly overruled State v. Board of Foreign Missions of Augustana Synod, supra, is clearly incorrect.
Reuben L. Anderson-Cherne, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 226 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1975
Reuben L. Anderson-Cherne, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation 226 N.W.2d 611 Minn. 1975
of Taxation, 292 Minn. 66
CC LEASING CORPORATION v. County of Hennepin 209 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1973
CC LEASING CORPORATION v. County of Hennepin 209 N.W.2d 672 Minn. 1973
of Taxation, 292 Minn. 66