42468
Precedential
Reinstated
Processed
Juvland v. Mattson
Cited by
- M.L. v. Magnuson 531 N.W.2d 849 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
- Strauss v. Waseca Village Bowl 378 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Ferguson v. Northern States Power Co. 239 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1976
- Begin v. Weber 234 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1975
- Lametti v. Peter Lametti Construction Co. 232 N.W.2d 435 Minn. 1975
- Line v. Nourie 215 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1974
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. 211 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1973
- Riley v. Lake 203 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1972
- Thielbar v. Juenke 189 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1971
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Koenigs v. Werner 116 N.W.2d 73
- Blomberg v. Tschida 130 N.W.2d 237
Opinion text
Otis, Justice (dissenting). The verdicts are fully sustained by the evidence and should be reinstated without imposing on the litigants the retrial of issues we agree were properly resolved. Murphy, Justice (dissenting). I join in the dissent of Mr. Justice Otis. Kelly, Justice (dissenting). I join in the dissent of Mr. Justice Otis.