Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sheehan v. St. Peter's Catholic School, 188 N.W.2d 868.

25 citing documents.

Joe Schafer, et al., as Parents and Natural Guardians of Minor W.S., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Meagan Abel, Minn. 2020
Fenrich v. Blake Sch. 920 N.W.2d 195 Minn. 2018
Todd C. Sharkey v. City of Shoreview, Jerome P. Filla, Kari L. Quinn, Thomas R. Hughes 853 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Todd C. Sharkey v. City of Shoreview, Jerome P. Filla, Kari L. Quinn, Thomas R. Hughes 853 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Peter's Catholic Sch., 291 Minn. 1, 6, (addressing a motion for leave to amend a complaint filed two years after the defendant answered); Davis v. Midwest Disc.
State v. Baxter 686 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Baxter 686 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Peter’s Catholic Sch., 291 Minn. 1, 6 , (concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to amend when motion was made on eve of trial, two years after answer was served, and no reason was given for delay); LOL Fin.
S.W. v. Spring Lake Park School District No. 16 592 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
S.W. v. Spring Lake Park School District No. 16 592 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Peter’s Catholic School, 291 Minn. 1, 3 , the supreme court required school districts to exercise ordinary care to prevent foreseeable misconduct of other students.
Hernandez Ex Rel. Hernandez v. Renville Public School District No. 654 542 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Hernandez Ex Rel. Hernandez v. Renville Public School District No. 654 542 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Peter’s Catholic Sch., 291 Minn. 1, 3
P.L. v. Aubert 527 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
P.L. v. Aubert 527 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Peter’s Catholic Sch., 291 Minn. 1, 3
Verhel Ex Rel. Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709 359 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1984
Verhel Ex Rel. Verhel v. Independent School District No. 709 359 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 1984
Peter’s Catholic School, 291 Minn. 1, 3
Hamilton v. Independent School District No. 114 355 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hamilton v. Independent School District No. 114 355 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Peter’s Catholic School, 291 Minn. 1, 3
LOL Finance Co. v. Romain Corp. 352 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
LOL Finance Co. v. Romain Corp. 352 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Peter’s Catholic School, 291 Minn. 1 , the court stated: In view of the lapse of over 2 years from the time the answer was served, clearly it was within the discretion of the trial court to refuse permission to introduce an entirely new issue at the moment of trial.
Warrick v. Giron 290 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1980
Warrick v. Giron 290 N.W.2d 166 Minn. 1980
Peter’s Catholic School, 291 Minn. 1, 6
Raleigh Ex Rel. Raleigh v. Independent School District No. 625 275 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1978
Raleigh Ex Rel. Raleigh v. Independent School District No. 625 275 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 1978
Peter’s Catholic School, 291 Minn. 1
Kingsley v. Ind. School Dist. No. 2, Hill City 251 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 1977
Kingsley v. Ind. School Dist. No. 2, Hill City 251 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 1977
Peter’s Catholic School, 291 Minn. 1 , that if there is evidence from which the jury can find that supervision would probably have prevented the accident, recovery is permitted.