DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Wallin v. Wallin, 187 N.W.2d 627.

122 citing documents.

  • Marriage of Otava v. Otava 374 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of Otava v. Otava 374 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    In Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261 , the trial court awarded custody of the parties’ daughter to the child’s paternal grandparents, and the child’s mother appealed.
  • In Re the Welfare of L.K.W. 372 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • In Re the Welfare of L.K.W. 372 N.W.2d 392 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Id.; Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 267
  • Marriage of Riley v. Riley 369 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of Riley v. Riley 369 N.W.2d 40 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 267
  • Marriage of Murray v. Murray 367 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of Murray v. Murray 367 N.W.2d 561 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    In these cases, the courts have held grandparents “may not be preferred over the natural [parent] in the absence of grave reasons for doing so.” see Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261
  • Lawver v. Lawver 360 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Lawver v. Lawver 360 N.W.2d 471 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 267
  • Marriage of Clark v. Clark 358 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Marriage of Clark v. Clark 358 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    It is understood that “the court’s decision [must] be set forth with a high degree of particularity if appellate review is to be meaningful [in custody matters].” Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 267
  • Pikula v. Pikula 349 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Pikula v. Pikula 349 N.W.2d 322 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261
  • Myhervold v. Myhervold 271 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1978
  • Myhervold v. Myhervold 271 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1978
    See, Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld, 311 Minn. 76, 83 , Peterson v. Peterson, 308 Minn. 297, 308 , Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 266
  • Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld 249 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1976
  • Rosenfeld v. Rosenfeld 249 N.W.2d 168 Minn. 1976
    2 In Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 267 , this court stated: “* * * [I]n custody matters and in domestic relations cases *82 generally, a high regard must necessarily be given to the trial court’s discretion.
  • Ryan v. Ryan 219 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1974
  • Ryan v. Ryan 219 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1974
    We regard such a determination as essential in the disposition of the matter before us. Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261
  • Petersen v. Petersen 206 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1973
  • Petersen v. Petersen 206 N.W.2d 658 Minn. 1973
    In the matter before us, although the court did not set out its findings with the particularity helpful to a reviewing court, Wallin v. Wallin, 290 Minn. 261, 267 , the record sustains the court’s decision.