DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 187 N.W.2d 133.

352 citing documents.

  • Fontaine v. Steen 759 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • Fontaine v. Steen 759 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    A claim that is based on “mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities” is waived “unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.” State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (quoting Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , ).
  • Braend Ex Rel. Minor Children v. Braend 721 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • Braend Ex Rel. Minor Children v. Braend 721 N.W.2d 924 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    See Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.”).
  • Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. 683 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • Dougherty v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. 683 N.W.2d 855 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    See Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , (stating that assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal absent prejudicial error).
  • Swarthout v. Mutual Service Life Insurance Co. 632 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Braith v. Fischer 632 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Braith v. Fischer 632 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    (stating appellate courts do not address issues or theories not raised in district court); Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , , 135 (1971) (stating assignment of error based on mere assertion and unsupported by argument or authority waived unless error is obvious).
  • Swarthout v. Mutual Service Life Insurance Co. 632 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Under Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , [a]n assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection.
  • In Re Robb 622 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • In Re Robb 622 N.W.2d 564 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , (citation omitted).
  • In re A.R.M. 611 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • In Re ARM 611 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • In re A.R.M. 611 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    See Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , , 135 (1971) (stating assignment of error based on mere assertion and unsupported by argument or authority waived unless error is obvious).
  • In Re ARM 611 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    See Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , (stating assignment of error based on mere assertion and unsupported by argument or authority waived unless error is obvious).
  • Douglas v. Schuette 607 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • Douglas v. Schuette 607 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    See Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , (“assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection”) (citations omitted).
  • Brett v. Watts 601 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • Brett v. Watts 601 N.W.2d 199 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    Barrett v. Korbel, 300 Minn. 563, 563 , Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20
  • Meiske v. Lift-Stak & Stor, Inc. 599 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • Meiske v. Lift-Stak & Stor, Inc. 599 N.W.2d 175 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20
  • State v. Wilson 594 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • State v. Wilson 594 N.W.2d 268 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    State v. Modern Recycling, Inc., (quoting Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , , 135 (1971)); review denied (Minn. Jan.
  • Joelson v. O'KEEFE 594 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
  • Joelson v. O'KEEFE 594 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
    Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet, 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , , 135 (1971); (declining to consider issue when appellant failed to brief it and instead cited arguments in transcript), review denied (Minn. Oct.
  • Cole v. Star Tribune 581 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • Cole v. Star Tribune 581 N.W.2d 364 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    (citing Schoepke v. Alexander *372 Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518 , [519-20], , [135] (1971)), or dismissal of an appeal.
  • Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 578 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
  • Marriage of Holmberg v. Holmberg 578 N.W.2d 817 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519 , (assignment of error based on "mere assertion” and not supported by argument or authority in appellant's brief is waived unless error is obvious).
  • MINNESOTA SCHOOL BD. v. Dahl 566 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • MINNESOTA SCHOOL BD. v. Dahl 566 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    See Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519 , (noting that party's assertion of error, without more, is ordinarily inadequate).
  • State v. Modern Recycling, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
  • State v. Modern Recycling, Inc. 558 N.W.2d 770 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
    Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20
  • State Department of Labor & Industry Ex Rel. Special Compensation Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc. 555 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • State Department of Labor & Industry Ex Rel. Special Compensation Fund v. Wintz Parcel Drivers, Inc. 555 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20
  • Zahavy v. University of Minnesota 544 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • Zahavy v. University of Minnesota 544 N.W.2d 32 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    See Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20 , ("assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant's brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection”).
  • Port Authority of St. Paul v. Harstad 531 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • Port Authority of St. Paul v. Harstad 531 N.W.2d 496 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    See Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519 , (“An assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s brief is waived.”).
  • SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co. 515 N.W.2d 588 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20
  • Ganguli v. University of Minnesota 512 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
  • Ganguli v. University of Minnesota 512 N.W.2d 918 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
    See Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519 , ("assignment of error based on mere assertion and not supported by any argument or authorities in appellant’s *920 brief is waived and will not be considered on appeal unless prejudicial error is obvious on mere inspection”).
  • Taubman v. Prospect Drilling & Sawing, Inc. 469 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • Taubman v. Prospect Drilling & Sawing, Inc. 469 N.W.2d 335 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    (l)(d); see also Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518, 519-20
  • Peterson v. Board of County Commissioners 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
  • In Re Independent School Dist. No. 381 in Lake Cty. 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
  • Peterson v. Board of County Commissioners 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
    284 Minn. 125 , Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co. 290 Minn. 518
  • In Re Independent School Dist. No. 381 in Lake Cty. 213 N.W.2d 631 Minn. 1973
    ery Co. v. Grobe, 264 Minn. 435 , Lowe v. Patterson, 265 Minn. 42 , In re Appeal of Leary, 272 Minn. 34 , Campbell v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc., 273 Minn. 525 , Village of Farmington v. Minnesota Municipal Comm., 284 Minn. 125 , Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co., 290 Minn. 518