Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., 190 N.W.2d 77.

65 citing documents.

Tama May Boe Kerber, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
The “discovery rule” tolls the statute of limitations until the plaintiff discovers the facts giving rise to a cause of action; it has been narrowly applied in Minnesota to medical malpractice cases in which “a physician prevents a patient from discovering a cause of action against the physician by fraudulent 9 concealment.” Johnson v. Winthrop Lab’ys Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc.
In re The Robert Preus and Donna Mae Preus Lake Property Family Trust. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc. , (acknowledging that the application of a statute of limitations is a legal issue).
A19-0155 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc.
Thole v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Thole v. Commissioner of Public Safety 831 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 151, ).
Sanchez v. State 816 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2012
Sanchez v. State 816 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 2012
Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 151 , (“The legislature has not seen fit to provide a statutory tolling period to protect plaintiffs from their own ignorance although we held many years ago that such ignorance does not toll statutes of limitations.”).
Langer v. Commissioner of Revenue 773 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 2009
Langer v. Commissioner of Revenue 773 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 2009
Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 151 , Dumont v. Comm’r of Taxation, 278 Minn. 312 , 315 Sollar v. Oliver Iron Mining Co., 237 Minn. 170, 175
Murphy v. Allina Health System 668 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Murphy v. Allina Health System 668 N.W.2d 17 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
-43 (Minn.App.2003) (citing Johnson v. Winthrop Labs., 291 Minn. 145, 149 , ), review denied (Minn. July 15, 2003).
Molloy v. Meier 660 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Broek v. Park Nicollet Health Services 660 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Molloy v. Meier 660 N.W.2d 444 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 149
Broek v. Park Nicollet Health Services 660 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Johnson v. Winthrop Labs., 291 Minn. 145, 149 , 190 *
Jacobson v. Board of Trustees 627 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Jacobson v. Board of Trustees 627 N.W.2d 106 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“Courts have no authority to extend or modify statutory limitations periods.” Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 151 , (citation omitted).
Herrmann v. McMenomy & Severson 583 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Herrmann v. McMenomy & Severson 583 N.W.2d 283 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 151 , (citations omitted).
Zagaros v. Erickson 558 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Zagaros v. Erickson 558 N.W.2d 516 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 151 , (rejecting the discovery rule).
N.K.K. Ex Rel. Knudson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 555 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
N.K.K. Ex Rel. Knudson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 555 N.W.2d 21 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 152-53
Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 548 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1996
Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 548 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1996
Div. of Sterling Drugs, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 151
Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 534 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hermeling v. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. 534 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See, e.g., Johnson v. Winthrop Lab., 291 Minn. 145, 151 , (statutes of limitations are within the legislative domain and courts have no authority to extend or modify the limits prescribed by statute).
Fabio v. Bellomo 504 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1993
Fabio v. Bellomo 504 N.W.2d 758 Minn. 1993
Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 149 , Schmit v. Esser, 183 Minn. 354, 358 , 236 N.W.
Willette v. the Mayo Foundation 458 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Willette v. the Mayo Foundation 458 N.W.2d 120 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145 , Schmitt v. Esser, 178 Minn. 82 , 226 N.W.
Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center 457 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1990
Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical Center 457 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1990
Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Div. of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 148
Francis v. Hansing 449 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Francis v. Hansing 449 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 149
St. Aubin v. Burke 434 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
St. Aubin v. Burke 434 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Since then, Minnesota has continued to follow the “termination of treatment rule.” See Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145
Sabes & Richman, Inc. v. Muenzer 431 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Sabes & Richman, Inc. v. Muenzer 431 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
This rule was rejected in Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 149
Chizmadia v. Smiley's Point Clinic 428 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Chizmadia v. Smiley's Point Clinic 428 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145
Franklin Auto Body Co. v. Wicker 414 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Franklin Auto Body Co. v. Wicker 414 N.W.2d 509 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories, 291 Minn. 145, 151
Werlein v. Federal Cartridge Corp. 401 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Werlein v. Federal Cartridge Corp. 401 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drugs, Inc., 291 Minn. 145, 151 , Dumont v. Commissioner of Taxation, 278 Minn. 312 , Humphrey v. Carpenter, 39 Minn. 115 , 39 N.W.
Miller v. Mercy Medical Center 380 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Miller v. Mercy Medical Center 380 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145 , Schmit v. Esser, 183 Minn. 354, 358 , 236 N.W.
Krause v. Farber 379 N.W.2d 93 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Krause v. Kim 379 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Krause v. Kim 379 N.W.2d 91 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Johnson v. Winthrop Laboratories Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., 291 Minn. 145