DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McLaughlin v. State, 190 N.W.2d 867.

26 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    3 In general , “a guilty plea by a counseled defendant operates as a waiver of all nonjurisdictional defects.” see also McLaughlin v. State , 291 Minn. 277, 280-82, , 870 -71 (1971).
  • State v. Juarez 837 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 2013
  • State v. Juarez 837 N.W.2d 473 Minn. 2013
    at 488 (quoting McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277, 284 , ).
  • State v. Rasmussen 749 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Rasmussen 749 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    See McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277, 280-81 , -71 (1971).
  • State v. Dettman 719 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Marchbanks 632 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • State v. Marchbanks 632 N.W.2d 725 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277, 284
  • State v. Chambers 589 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1999
  • State v. Chambers 589 N.W.2d 466 Minn. 1999
    2726 , 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972) (Burger, C.J., dissenting)); see also McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277, 284
  • State v. Mitchell 577 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Mitchell 577 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1998
    A lawmaking body is equipped to weigh the policy considerations involved and determine what sanctions, if any, serve the interests of the people it represents.” McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277, 284
  • State v. Lothenbach 296 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Lothenbach 296 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 1980
    McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277
  • State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1980
    McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277
  • Carle v. State 257 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1977
  • Carle v. State 257 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1977
    2909 , 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976); McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277
  • Hirt v. State 244 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 1976
  • Hirt v. State 244 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 1976
    Further, defendant waived his right to raise the Fourth Amendment issues when he pleaded guilty upon the advice of competent counsel, McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277 , and the pre-sentence investigation issue is purely statutory and therefore not properly raised in a postconviction proceeding, Gaulke v. State, 289 Minn. 354
  • Pokrzywinski v. State 198 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1972
  • Pokrzywinski v. State 198 N.W.2d 522 Minn. 1972
    McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277 , McMann v. Richardson, 397 U. S. 759 , 90 S. Ct. 1441 , 25 L. ed. 2d 763 (1970).
  • Walton v. State 198 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1972
  • Walton v. State 198 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1972
    We need not discuss the first claim in detail since we have previously held in McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277 , relying upon McMann v. Richardson, 397 U. S. 759 , 90 S. Ct. 1441 , 25 L. ed. 2d 763 (1970), that by pleading guilty upon the advice of counsel, a defendant waives his right to challenge the admissibility of any confessions and therefore loses his right to claim later that illegally obtained
  • State v. Danaher 197 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Danaher 197 N.W.2d 425 Minn. 1972
    Cf. McMann v. Richardson, 397 U. S. 759 , 90 S. Ct. 1441 , 25 L. ed. 2d 763 (1970); McLaughlin v. State, 291 Minn. 277