Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 189 N.W.2d 499.

76 citing documents.

Sohns v. Pederson 354 N.W.2d 852 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518
Johnson v. Moberg 354 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The obligation does not arise before the amount of damages is “readily ascertainable.” Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513
Summit Court, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 354 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1984
Summit Court, Inc. v. Northern States Power Co. 354 N.W.2d 13 Minn. 1984
rest on a final judgment where the damages claim is liquidated or, if unliq-uidated, “where the damages were readily ascertainable by computation or reference to generally recognized standards such as market value and not where the amount of damages depended upon contingencies or upon jury discretion (as in actions for personal injury or injury to reputation).” Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance, Continental Casualty Co. 336 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1983
Jostens, Inc. v. CNA Insurance, Continental Casualty Co. 336 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1983
As to when interest begins, we listed two factors in Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518 , which should be considered, namely: (1) that plaintiff actually suffers loss of the use of its money from the date of the wrongful act; and (2) “one who cannot ascertain the amount of damages for which he might be held liable cannot be expected to tender payment and thereby stop the
Hueper v. Goodrich 314 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1982
Hueper v. Goodrich 314 N.W.2d 828 Minn. 1982
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513, 518
Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc. 299 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1980
Polaris Industries v. Plastics, Inc. 299 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1980
The trial court denied prejudgment interest in the sum of $66,758.31 on the grounds that the damages were unliquidated and not readily ascertainable prior to trial, citing Alley Construction Co., Inc. v. State, 300 Minn. 346 , and Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513
Thompson v. Gasparro 257 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1977
ICC Leasing Corp. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co. 257 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1977
Thompson v. Gasparro 257 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1977
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513 , McCormack v. Hankscraft Co., 281 Minn. 571
ICC Leasing Corp. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co. 257 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1977
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc., 291 Minn. 513
Bonhiver v. Graff 248 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1976
Bonhiver v. Graff 248 N.W.2d 291 Minn. 1976
Co. v. McClure Logging Co. 103 Minn. 471 , ; Swanson v. Andrus, 83 Minn. 505 , ; 5 Corbin, Contracts, § 1048.” In Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. 291 Minn. 513 , defendant Maxwell modified the propellers of plaintiff’s airplane in order to improve their synchronization.
Hedberg & Sons Co. v. County of Hennepin 232 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1975
Hedberg & Sons Co. v. County of Hennepin 232 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1975
McCormack v. Hankscraft Co. 281 Minn. 571 , Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. 291 Minn. 513
General Mills, Inc. v. State 226 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1975
General Mills, Inc. v. State 226 N.W.2d 296 Minn. 1975
McCormack v. Hankscraft Co. 281 Minn. 571 , Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. 291 Minn. 513
Alley Construction Co., Inc. v. State 219 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1974
Alley Construction Co., Inc. v. State 219 N.W.2d 922 Minn. 1974
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. 291 Minn. 513
Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. 211 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1973
Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc. 211 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1973
Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. 291 Minn. 513 , Moosbrugger v. McGraw-Edison Co. 284 Minn. 143 , Employers Lia.
State ex rel. Head v. Gilson 194 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1972
State ex rel. Head v. Gilson 194 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1972
See, also, Potter v. Hartzell Propeller, Inc. 291 Minn. 513

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by