DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas Company, 191 N.W.2d 418.

62 citing documents.

  • Easton Farmers Elevator Co. v. Chromalloy American Corp. 246 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1976
  • Easton Farmers Elevator Co. v. Chromalloy American Corp. 246 N.W.2d 705 Minn. 1976
    The question of whether a Schwartz hearing is necessary is addressed to the discretion of the trial court, Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas Co. 291 Minn. 334 , and we are persuaded defendants failed to aver sufficient facts suggesting jury misconduct so that the failure to grant a Schwartz hearing constituted an abuse of discretion.
  • Goblirsch v. Western Land Roller Co. 246 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1976
  • Goblirsch v. Western Land Roller Co. 246 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1976
    See, Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co. 258 Minn. 325 , Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas Co. 291 Minn. 334
  • Schrupp v. Hanson 235 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1975
  • Schrupp v. Hanson 235 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1975
    What we said in Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas Co. 291 Minn. 334, 343 , is here pertinent: “The time that a verdict loser should approach the court to *155 request a Schwartz hearing should be when the first suspicion of misconduct arises.
  • Collins v. Bridgland 206 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1973
  • Collins v. Bridgland 206 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1973
    It has been held in Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas Co. 291 Minn. 334, 342 , : “* * * A trial court is not justified in ordering a new trial simply because a peremptory challenge might have been exercised had the attorney elicited certain information on the voir dire examination.” 2 The fact of the defendants’ insurance is not to be brought to the attention
  • Fick v. Wolfinger 198 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1972
  • Fick v. Wolfinger 198 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1972
    Rather than promptly approaching the trial court with a request that the jurors be interrogated at a hearing on the matter, Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co. 258 Minn. 325, 328 , Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas Co. 291 Minn. 334, 342 , plaintiff’s counsel unilaterally obtained affidavits from jurors.
  • Tupper v. Dirks 193 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1972
  • Tupper v. Dirks 193 N.W.2d 800 Minn. 1972
    With respect to the claim of jury misconduct, plaintiff failed to pursue the procedures we outlined in Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co. 258 Minn. 325 , recently reviewed in Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas Co. 291 Minn. 334