42632
Precedential
Denied
Processed
Sebby v. Libby
Cited by
- Western National Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- Russell v. Johnson 608 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Gray v. Davis 414 N.W.2d 238 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Tsudek v. Target Stores, Inc. 414 N.W.2d 466 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Zurn v. Hunt 409 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Germann v. F.L. Smithe MacHine Co. 381 N.W.2d 503 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Betz Ex Rel. Betz v. Nelson 367 N.W.2d 922 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Federal Pacific Electric Co. 363 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
- Olson v. Havir Manufacturing Co. of St. Paul 357 N.W.2d 136 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
- Hauenstein v. Loctite Corp. 347 N.W.2d 272 Minn. 1984
- Axelson v. Williamson 324 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 1982
- Bedor v. Ekdahl 248 N.W.2d 321 Minn. 1976
Opinion text
Per Curiam. Certiorari to review a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission which denied employee’s claim that her neurotic condition was a previous disability which combined with her work-related injury to produce permanent and total disability. The commission’s decision in this particular case that employee’s neurotic condition did not combine with her work-related injury to *534 cause permanent and total disability is supported by substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted. We affirm the commission’s decision. Our affirmance of this issue is determinative of all other contentions raised by appellant. Affirmed.