Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brown v. Wells, 181 N.W.2d 708.
-
A24-1454 A24-1455 A24-1700 A24-1741 A24-1750
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
When “there is room for two opinions on the matter, such action is not ‘arbitrary and capricious,’ even though it may be believed that an erroneous conclusion has been reached.”
- In the Matter of the SIRS Appeal of Community Involvement Programs-FSE. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- Rochester City Lines, Co. v. City of Rochester, First Transit, Inc. 868 N.W.2d 655 Minn. 2015
- In Re the Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas Utilities 768 N.W.2d 112 Minn. 2009
-
In Re the Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas Utilities
768 N.W.2d 112
Minn. 2009
Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472
- In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Contained in Panel Case No. 15976 653 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 2002
-
In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Contained in Panel Case No. 15976
653 N.W.2d 452
Minn. 2002
“Where there is room for two opinions on the matter, [a decision] is not ‘arbitrary and capricious,’ even though it may be believed that an erroneous conclusion has been reached.” Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472
- CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis 633 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
CUP Foods, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis
633 N.W.2d 557
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
“Where there is room for two opinions on the matter, [an agency’s choice of one course of] action is not arbitrary and capricious * * *.” Friedenson, d at 467 (citing Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472 , ).
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota 624 N.W.2d 264 Minn. 2001
-
In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Minnesota
624 N.W.2d 264
Minn. 2001
See Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472 , ("Where there is room for Iwo opinions on the matter, such action is not 'arbitrary and capricious' even though it may be believed that an erroneous conclusion has been reached.”).
- In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Contained in Panel File 98-26 597 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1999
-
In Re Charges of Unprofessional Conduct Contained in Panel File 98-26
597 N.W.2d 563
Minn. 1999
“Where there is room for two opinions on the matter, [a decision] is not ‘arbitrary and capricious,’ even though it may be believed that an erroneous conclusion has been reached.” Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472
- Zellman Ex Rel. M.Z. v. Independent School District No. 2758 594 N.W.2d 216 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Zellman Ex Rel. M.Z. v. Independent School District No. 2758
594 N.W.2d 216
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
A decision is arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable if it is “willful and unreasoning, without consideration of the facts and circumstances.” Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472 , -11 (1970); see Markwardt v. State of Minn., Water Resources Bd., (decision is arbitrary and capricious if it represents a governmental entity’s will rather than its judgment).
- In Re Medical License of Friedenson 574 N.W.2d 463 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
In Re Medical License of Friedenson
574 N.W.2d 463
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
“Where there is room for two opinions on the matter, such action is not ‘arbitrary and capricious’ * * Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472
- Petition of Minnesota Power 545 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
Petition of Minnesota Power
545 N.W.2d 49
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Ass’n, 289 Minn. 378, 381 , d *52 662, 664, (1971)(quoting Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472 , ).
- Minnegasco v. MN PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N 529 N.W.2d 413 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
Minnegasco v. MN PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N
529 N.W.2d 413
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
(citing Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472 , ).
- In Re the License Application of Rochester Ambulance Service 500 N.W.2d 495 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
In Re the License Application of Rochester Ambulance Service
500 N.W.2d 495
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472
- Pletan v. Gaines 481 N.W.2d 566 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
-
Pletan v. Gaines
481 N.W.2d 566
Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The discretionary function exception is designed to ensure that courts do not attempt “to control the discretion vested in a legally constituted educational board or to substitute our judgment for the judgment of such board upon a question which is within the sphere of its authority.” Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 474
- In re Summary Investigation into Intrastate Switched Access Charges Proposed by Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. for its Minnesota … 402 N.W.2d 242 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
In re Summary Investigation into Intrastate Switched Access Charges Proposed by Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. for its Minnesota …
402 N.W.2d 242
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472
- In re Minnesota Power's Transfer of M.L. Hibbard Units 3 & 4 Boilers & Related Facilities to the … 399 N.W.2d 147 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
In re Minnesota Power's Transfer of M.L. Hibbard Units 3 & 4 Boilers & Related Facilities to the …
399 N.W.2d 147
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472
- Draganosky v. Minnesota Board of Psychology 352 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Draganosky v. Minnesota Board of Psychology
352 N.W.2d 432
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 342 N.W.2d 348 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
-
Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
342 N.W.2d 348
Minn. Ct. App. 1983
(Quoting Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472 , The court also said: Since we cannot say that the commission’s decision was entirely wrong, there is no basis for substituting our judgment for that of the commission upon a question which the commission is authorized by law to determine.
- Koronis Manor Nursing Home v. Department of Public Welfare 249 N.W.2d 448 Minn. 1976
-
Koronis Manor Nursing Home v. Department of Public Welfare
249 N.W.2d 448
Minn. 1976
LaCrescent Constant Care Center, Inc. v. State, 301 Minn. 229 , Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468 , State ex rel.
- Perry v. Independent School District No. 696 210 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1973
-
Perry v. Independent School District No. 696
210 N.W.2d 283
Minn. 1973
The trial court, relying on Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468 , reasoned that policies and regulations of a school board should not be overturned by the courts unless they are clearly unreasonable and arbitrary.
- Thompson v. Barnes 200 N.W.2d 921 Minn. 1972
-
Thompson v. Barnes
200 N.W.2d 921
Minn. 1972
See, Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468 , Revised Constitution of the Minnesota State High School League, art. 1, § 2, the Forty-Ninth Annual Official Handbook, p. 34 (1971-1972) (hereafter called Official Handbook).
- Pearson v. Independent School District No. 716 188 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 1971
-
Pearson v. Independent School District No. 716
188 N.W.2d 776
Minn. 1971
See, Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468 , 181 N. W. (2d) 708 .
- Village of Goodview v. Winona Area Industrial Development Ass'n 184 N.W.2d 662 Minn. 1971
-
Village of Goodview v. Winona Area Industrial Development Ass'n
184 N.W.2d 662
Minn. 1971
In Brown v. Wells, 288 Minn. 468, 472 , 181 N. W. (2d) 708, 711 , we said: “Where there is room for two opinions on the matter, such action is not ‘arbitrary and capricious,’ even though it may be believed that an erronerous conclusion has been reached.” Since we cannot say that the commission’s decision was entirely wrong, there is no basis for subs