Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Walker, 235 N.W.2d 810.
- Adrian Dominic Riley v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2025
-
Adrian Dominic Riley v. State of Minnesota
Minn. 2025
In State v. Walker, we commented on the PSI requirement in Minn. Stat. § 609.115, explaining that “no defendant has an absolute right to demand [a PSI].”
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
The purpose of rebuttal evidence “is to cut down defendant’s case and not merely to confirm the case in chief through restatement or new facts.” State v. Walker, 9
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Gardner also contends that the district court erred on the ground that , as a general matter, the purpose of rebuttal evidence “is to cut down the defendant’s case and not merely to confirm the case in chief through restatement or new facts.” See State v. Walker
- State v. Swaney 787 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 2010
-
State v. Swaney
787 N.W.2d 541
Minn. 2010
We have explained that “[i]n general, rebuttal evidence consists of that which explains, contradicts, or refutes the defendant’s evidence.” accord State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 112
- State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
-
State v. Penkaty
708 N.W.2d 185
Minn. 2006
at 598 ( State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , ).
- State v. Dahlin 695 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 2005
-
State v. Dahlin
695 N.W.2d 588
Minn. 2005
Bellcourt, d at 274 (stating that defendant’s request that the court not give a warranted lesser-included offense instruction constituted a waiver and the trial court did not err in refusing to give it); State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120-21 , (holding that when a defendant knowingly waived a lesser-included offense instruction warranted by the evidence, the defendant could not subsequently allege that the trial court erred in not sua sponte giving the instruction).
- State v. Mitchell 577 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1998
-
State v. Mitchell
577 N.W.2d 481
Minn. 1998
State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 111 , -15 (1975), cert.
- State v. Willis 559 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1997
-
State v. Willis
559 N.W.2d 693
Minn. 1997
State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 114 , cert.
- State v. Christie 506 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1993
-
State v. Christie
506 N.W.2d 293
Minn. 1993
In State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 110 , cert.
- State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Benson 495 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Benson
495 N.W.2d 613
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
See State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 111 , (life sentence is “a 25-year minimum prison term, less time credited for good behavior”), ce rt.
- State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
-
State v. Pilcher
472 N.W.2d 327
Minn. 1991
While length and severity of a beating could show premeditation, State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120 , cert.
- State v. Bauer 471 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
State v. Bauer
471 N.W.2d 363
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
2716, 2722-23 , 97 L.Ed.2d 56 (1987) (mandatory death penalty statute violates the eighth amendment); cf. State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 111 , -15 (1975), cert.
- State v. Gore 451 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1990
-
State v. Gore
451 N.W.2d 313
Minn. 1990
State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 112 , cert, denied sub nom.
- State v. Moore 438 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1989
-
State v. Moore
438 N.W.2d 101
Minn. 1989
State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120-121
- State v. Smith 367 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1985
-
State v. Smith
367 N.W.2d 497
Minn. 1985
State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , cert.
- State v. Cermak 365 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1985
-
State v. Cermak
365 N.W.2d 243
Minn. 1985
State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , *247
- State v. Spurgin 358 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1984
-
State v. Spurgin
358 N.W.2d 648
Minn. 1984
While length and severity of a beating could show premeditation, State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , cert.
- State v. Fratzke 354 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1984
-
State v. Fratzke
354 N.W.2d 402
Minn. 1984
State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120
- State v. Jones 347 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1984
-
State v. Jones
347 N.W.2d 796
Minn. 1984
State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120
- State v. Ulm 326 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1982
-
State v. Ulm
326 N.W.2d 159
Minn. 1982
State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 110-11 , cert.
- State v. Hardimon 310 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1981
-
State v. Hardimon
310 N.W.2d 564
Minn. 1981
As to the relevance of some of these facts, particularly prior robbery planning and defendant’s desire to prevent identification, and State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105
- State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
-
State v. Linder
304 N.W.2d 902
Minn. 1981
In State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , cert.
- State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
-
State v. Wahlberg
296 N.W.2d 408
Minn. 1980
In State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120 , cert.
- State v. McCullum 289 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1979
-
State v. McCullum
289 N.W.2d 89
Minn. 1979
In State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , certiorari denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct.
- Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
-
Bangert v. State
282 N.W.2d 540
Minn. 1979
We recently addressed this issue in State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , , certiorari denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct.
- State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
-
State v. Underwood
281 N.W.2d 337
Minn. 1979
See State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , certiorari denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct.