Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Walker, 235 N.W.2d 810.

60 citing documents.

  • Adrian Dominic Riley v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2025
  • Adrian Dominic Riley v. State of Minnesota Minn. 2025
    In State v. Walker, we commented on the PSI requirement in Minn. Stat. § 609.115, explaining that “no defendant has an absolute right to demand [a PSI].”
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    The purpose of rebuttal evidence “is to cut down defendant’s case and not merely to confirm the case in chief through restatement or new facts.” State v. Walker, 9
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
    Gardner also contends that the district court erred on the ground that , as a general matter, the purpose of rebuttal evidence “is to cut down the defendant’s case and not merely to confirm the case in chief through restatement or new facts.” See State v. Walker
  • State v. Swaney 787 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 2010
  • State v. Swaney 787 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 2010
    We have explained that “[i]n general, rebuttal evidence consists of that which explains, contradicts, or refutes the defendant’s evidence.” accord State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 112
  • State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Penkaty 708 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 2006
    at 598 ( State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , ).
  • State v. Dahlin 695 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Dahlin 695 N.W.2d 588 Minn. 2005
    Bellcourt, d at 274 (stating that defendant’s request that the court not give a warranted lesser-included offense instruction constituted a waiver and the trial court did not err in refusing to give it); State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120-21 , (holding that when a defendant knowingly waived a lesser-included offense instruction warranted by the evidence, the defendant could not subsequently allege that the trial court erred in not sua sponte giving the instruction).
  • State v. Mitchell 577 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1998
  • State v. Mitchell 577 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1998
    State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 111 , -15 (1975), cert.
  • State v. Willis 559 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Willis 559 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1997
    State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 114 , cert.
  • State v. Christie 506 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Christie 506 N.W.2d 293 Minn. 1993
    In State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 110 , cert.
  • State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Benson 495 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State Ex Rel. McMaster v. Benson 495 N.W.2d 613 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    See State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 111 , (life sentence is “a 25-year minimum prison term, less time credited for good behavior”), ce rt.
  • State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
  • State v. Pilcher 472 N.W.2d 327 Minn. 1991
    While length and severity of a beating could show premeditation, State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120 , cert.
  • State v. Bauer 471 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
  • State v. Bauer 471 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
    2716, 2722-23 , 97 L.Ed.2d 56 (1987) (mandatory death penalty statute violates the eighth amendment); cf. State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 111 , -15 (1975), cert.
  • State v. Gore 451 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1990
  • State v. Gore 451 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1990
    State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 112 , cert, denied sub nom.
  • State v. Moore 438 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1989
  • State v. Moore 438 N.W.2d 101 Minn. 1989
    State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120-121
  • State v. Smith 367 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Smith 367 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1985
    State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , cert.
  • State v. Cermak 365 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1985
  • State v. Cermak 365 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1985
    State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , *247
  • State v. Spurgin 358 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Spurgin 358 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1984
    While length and severity of a beating could show premeditation, State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , cert.
  • State v. Fratzke 354 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Fratzke 354 N.W.2d 402 Minn. 1984
    State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120
  • State v. Jones 347 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Jones 347 N.W.2d 796 Minn. 1984
    State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120
  • State v. Ulm 326 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Ulm 326 N.W.2d 159 Minn. 1982
    State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 110-11 , cert.
  • State v. Hardimon 310 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Hardimon 310 N.W.2d 564 Minn. 1981
    As to the relevance of some of these facts, particularly prior robbery planning and defendant’s desire to prevent identification, and State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105
  • State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Linder 304 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1981
    In State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , cert.
  • State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Wahlberg 296 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 1980
    In State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105, 120 , cert.
  • State v. McCullum 289 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1979
  • State v. McCullum 289 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1979
    In State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , certiorari denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct.
  • Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
  • Bangert v. State 282 N.W.2d 540 Minn. 1979
    We recently addressed this issue in State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , , certiorari denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct.
  • State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
    See State v. Walker, 306 Minn. 105 , certiorari denied, 426 U.S. 950 , 96 S.Ct.