DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Cox, 200 N.W.2d 305.

30 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota v. Kyle Mark Watson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Kyle Mark Watson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
    See State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252, 254 n.1, n.1 (Minn. 1972) (noting that information provided by a person with a criminal background or involvement in the reported event is not presumed reliable).
  • State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Moorman 505 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1993
    State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252, 256
  • State v. Mortland 395 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Mortland 395 N.W.2d 469 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252, 256 , states that each case must be *474 decided on its own facts, “guided not by any magic formula but by the standard of reasonableness.” Id.
  • State v. Davis 390 N.W.2d 4 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Liggons 348 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • State v. Liggons 348 N.W.2d 785 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252, 256 , states that each case must be decided on its own facts, “guided not by any magic formula but by the standard of reasonableness.” The defendant argues that the evidence in this case did not support a finding of probable cause to believe that the defendant injured the victim.
  • State v. Compton 293 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1980
  • State v. Compton 293 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1980
    As we stated in State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252, 256 , : “ * * * [W]e must decide each case on its own facts, guided not by any magic formula but by the standard of reasonableness.
  • State v. Jankowski 281 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Jankowski 281 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1979
    State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252 , State v. Bruno, 293 Minn. 84
  • State v. Siegfried 274 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Siegfried 274 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1978
    See, also, State v. Mollberg, 310 Minn. 376 , State v. Phelps, 297 Minn. 61 , State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398 , State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252
  • State v. Willis 269 N.W.2d 355 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Carlson 267 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1978
  • State v. Carlson 267 N.W.2d 170 Minn. 1978
    See, e. g., State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252 , State v. Bean, 280 Minn. 35 , State v. Fish, 280 Minn. 163 , State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260 , , certiorari denied, 375 U.S. 867 , 84 S.Ct.
  • State v. Ruud 259 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Ruud 259 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1977
    “Unlike an informant whose information may come from his own criminal background or even complicity in the particular event reported, * * * [he] may be presumed reliable.” State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252, 254, note 1 , accord, State v. Mazzadra, 28 Conn.Sup.
  • State v. Nolting 254 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Nolting 254 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 1977
    E. g., State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252, 254, note 1 , People v. Glaubman, 175 Colo.
  • State v. Lee 225 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Lee 225 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1975
    As we stated in State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252, 256 , : *387 “* * * [W]e must decide each case on its own facts, guided not by any magic formula but by the standard of reasonableness.
  • State v. Phelps 209 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Phelps 209 N.W.2d 780 Minn. 1973
    State v. Lindquist, 295 Minn. 398 , State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252
  • State v. Carey 207 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Carey 207 N.W.2d 529 Minn. 1973
    State v. Sorenson, supra; State v. Clifford, 273 Minn. 249, 252 , State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260, 264 , , certiorari denied, 375 U. S. 867 , 84 S. Ct. 141 , 11 L. ed. 2d 94 (1963); State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252, 256
  • State v. Lindquist 205 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Lindquist 205 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1973
    Indeed, in State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252 , we suggested that a first-time private citizen informer not involved in the criminal event he reports should be presumed to be telling the truth.