Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of America, 197 N.W.2d 448.

90 citing documents.

Glacier Park Iron Ore Properties, LLC, Minn. 2021
The court of appeals held that the MRUAA supersedes the “reasonably debatable” overruled by Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC , 1 and thus the district court decides arbitrability unless the 1 In Atcas, a case arising under Minnesota’s arbitration statute , Minn. Stat. §§ 572.08–.09 (1971) , we said that “if the intention of the parties is reasonably deba
Great Plains Educational Foundation, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Nat.’l Securities Inc., (quoting Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. , ).
KILCHER v. Dale 784 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
KILCHER v. Dale 784 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Partners, d at 337 (citing Ateas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of Am., 292 Minn. 334, 341 , ).
Gale v. Rittenhouse 686 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Gale v. Rittenhouse 686 N.W.2d 50 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Johnson v. Piper Jajfray, Inc., Ateas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of Am., 292 Minn. 334, 341 , Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of Univ.
Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC. 669 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 2003
Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC. 669 N.W.2d 344 Minn. 2003
The district court concluded that Onvoy was not compelled to arbitrate the dispute under Minnesota law, citing Ateas v. Credit Clearing Corp., 292 Minn. 334 , because the arbitration clause did not encompass the claims and arbitration is not appropriate when one party seeks to rescind the contract.
District 318 Service Employees Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 318 649 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
District 318 Service Employees Ass'n v. Independent School District No. 318 649 N.W.2d 896 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
See also Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp., 292 Minn. 334, 341 , (if no agreement to arbitrate exists, either in fact or because the controversy is not within the scope of the arbitration clause, the court may protect a party from being compelled to arbitrate).
CHURCHILL ENVIR. PARTNERS v. Ernst & Young 643 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
CHURCHILL ENVIR. PARTNERS v. Ernst & Young 643 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Peggy Rose Revocable Trust v. Eppich 640 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2002
Peggy Rose Revocable Trust v. Eppich 640 N.W.2d 601 Minn. 2002
In Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334, 341 , we confirmed that when a clear intent to arbitrate a dispute is present, the dispute is for the arbitrators to determine and not the court.
Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 616 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2000
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local 320 v. County of St. Louis 611 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Minnesota Teamsters Public & Law Enforcement Employees' Union, Local 320 v. County of St. Louis 611 N.W.2d 355 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Indeed, if the scope of the arbitration clause is at least reasonably debatable, “the issue of arbitrability is to be initially determined by the arbitrators.” Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of Am., 292 Minn. 334, 341
Ottman v. Fadden 575 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Ottman v. Fadden 575 N.W.2d 593 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
See Ateas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of Am., 292 Minn. 334, 340-50 , -57 (1972) (concluding no agreement to arbi *596 trate exists because controversy not within scope of arbitration clause).
Minnesota Community College Faculty Ass'n v. State 562 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Minnesota Community College Faculty Ass'n v. State 562 N.W.2d 685 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp., 292 Minn. 334, 341
Heyer v. Moldenhauer 538 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Heyer v. Moldenhauer 538 N.W.2d 714 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334, 347-48
In Re Grievance Arbitration Between Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. & City of Crosby 497 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
In Re Grievance Arbitration Between Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc. & City of Crosby 497 N.W.2d 308 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Atc as v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334, 341 , interprets section 572.09 as follows: (1) If the parties evinced a clear intent to arbitrate a controversy arising out of specific provisions of the contract, the matter is for the arbitrators to determine and not the court.
Stahl v. McGenty 486 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Stahl v. McGenty 486 N.W.2d 157 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of Am., 292 Minn. 334, 350
Welch v. Buller 481 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Welch v. Buller 481 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Miehael-Curry, d at 141 (citing Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp., 292 Minn. 334, 342 , ).
Duluth Police Local v. City of Duluth 466 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Duluth Police Local v. City of Duluth 466 N.W.2d 36 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp., 292 Minn. 334 , the Minnesota Supreme Court established guidelines to be followed in determining whether an issue is arbitrable: (1) If the parties evinced a clear intent to arbitrate a controversy arising out of specific provisions of the contract, the matter is for the arbitrators to determine and not the c
Fouquette v. FIRST AM. NAT. SEC., INC. 464 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Fouquette v. FIRST AM. NAT. SEC., INC. 464 N.W.2d 760 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Cell v. Moore & Schley Securities Corp., , 149 n. 4 (Minn.1989); see Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc., and Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp., 292 Minn. 334, 348
Local No. 1119, American Federation State, County, & Municipal Employees v. Mesabi Regional Medical Center 463 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Local No. 1119, American Federation State, County, & Municipal Employees v. Mesabi Regional Medical Center 463 N.W.2d 290 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Ateas v. Credit Clearing Corp., 292 Minn. 334, 341
School Service Employees Union Local 284 v. Independent School District 88 459 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
School Service Employees Union Local 284 v. Independent School District 88 459 N.W.2d 336 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334, 341
Columbia Heights Federation of Teachers Local 710 v. Independent School District No. 13 457 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Columbia Heights Federation of Teachers Local 710 v. Independent School District No. 13 457 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334, 341
Cell v. Moore & Schley Securities Corp. 449 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1989
Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating Trust 449 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1989
Cell v. Moore & Schley Securities Corp. 449 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1989
Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334, 348
Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating Trust 449 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1989
This court has said that “that issue is more properly determined by those trained in the law.” Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp., 292 Minn. 334, 350
Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating Trust 434 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating Trust 434 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334
R.M. Bennett Heirs v. Ontario Iron Co. 426 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
R.M. Bennett Heirs v. Ontario Iron Co. 426 N.W.2d 921 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of America, 292 Minn. 334, 341
Hay v. Dahle 386 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Hay v. Dahle 386 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corp. of America, 292 Minn. 334, 349
Juster Steel v. Carlson Companies 366 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 1985