DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Springrose v. Willmore, 192 N.W.2d 826.

118 citing documents.

  • Erickson v. Sorenson 211 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1973
  • Erickson v. Sorenson 211 N.W.2d 883 Minn. 1973
    Both parties and the court *455 were aware of a then-pending case, Springrose v. Willmore, 292 Minn. 23 , and anticipated our ruling that implied assumption of risk is to be considered a phase of contributory negligence and is to be submitted with and apportioned under Minn. St.
  • Moteberg v. Johnson 210 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1973
  • Moteberg v. Johnson 210 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1973
    Thus, the learned judge below anticipated this court’s ruling in Springrose v. Willmore, 292 Minn. 23 , wherein the doctrine of secondary assumption of risk, as such, was recast as an aspect of negligence only and no longer an absolute bar to recovery.
  • Schroeder v. Jesco, Inc. 209 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1973
  • Schroeder v. Jesco, Inc. 209 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 1973
    1 Springrose v. Willmore, 292 Minn. 23 , was decided on December 10, 1971.
  • Gottskalkson v. CITY OF CANBY 207 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1973
  • Gottskalkson v. CITY OF CANBY 207 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1973
    * The single issue raised on this appeal is whether the rule which we set out in Springrose v. Willmore, 292 Minn. 23 , recasting the doctrine of secondary assumption of risk as an aspect of negligence, should be applied retroactively to the case at hand.
  • Stenzel v. Bach 203 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1973
  • Stenzel v. Bach 203 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1973
    Defendant contends that the questions of both contributory negligence and assumption of risk should have been submitted to the jury and cites Springrose v. Willmore, 292 Minn. 23 , for the proposition that assumption of risk is still an affirmative defense barring any recovery by plaintiff in causes of action such as this one which arose before the decision in Springrose.
  • Meyer v. Bushma 202 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1972
  • Meyer v. Bushma 202 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1972
    This appeal is not governed by our decision in Springrose v. Willmore, 292 Minn. 23 , abolishing secondary assumption of risk as an absolute defense, that decision not being retrospective.
  • Olson v. Monson 200 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1972
  • Olson v. Monson 200 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1972
    This action was litigated prior to our decision in Springrose v. Willmore, 292 Minn. 23
  • Fick v. Wolfinger 198 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1972
  • Fick v. Wolfinger 198 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1972
    While plaintiff’s appeal was pending, we decided in Springrose v. Willmore, 292 Minn. 23 , that assumption of risk would no longer be a separate and absolute defense and was to be recast as an aspect of contributory negligence and apportioned under our comparative negligence statute.
  • Renne v. Gustafson 194 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 1972
  • Renne v. Gustafson 194 N.W.2d 267 Minn. 1972
    The issue of retention or rejection of assumption of risk was decided in Springrose v. Willmore, 292 Minn. 23 , in which it was held that secondary assumption of risk is to be recast as an aspect of contributory negligence and must be apportioned under our comparative negligence statute.