Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P., 216 N.W.2d 651.

85 citing documents.

Thompson v. City of Red Wing 455 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, 298 Minn. 471, 484 , -61 (1974).
Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'N 452 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Alevizos v. METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COM'N 452 N.W.2d 492 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
On March 15, 1974, the Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's denial of class certification in Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, 298 Minn. 471 , ( Alevizos I ).
Smith v. City of Owatonna 450 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1990
Smith v. City of Owatonna 450 N.W.2d 309 Minn. 1990
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airport Com’n, 298 Minn. 471, 487
Stenger v. State 449 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Stenger v. State 449 N.W.2d 483 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Appellants must show harm which is “direct, substantial, and peculiar to them in that it differs markedly from the damage suffered by the public at large.” Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, 298 Minn. 471, 485 , (Alevizos I).
Snyder v. City of Minneapolis 441 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1989
Snyder v. City of Minneapolis 441 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1989
See Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Comm’n., 298 Minn. 471 , 403 n. 1, , 660 n. 1 (1974).
Fitger Brewing Co. v. State 416 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Fitger Brewing Co. v. State 416 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, 298 Minn. 471, 484 , -61 (1974).
City of Prior Lake v. Ballard 375 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
City of Prior Lake v. Ballard 375 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, e.g., Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, 298 Minn. 471, 487 , (“the measure of recovery is decrease in market value of the property due to its decreased desirability in the general market place ⅜ * * ”).
Oswalt v. County of Ramsey 371 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Oswalt v. County of Ramsey 371 N.W.2d 241 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Paul, 298 Minn. 471 , [1974] [Minn.1984]).
Ario v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 367 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 1985
Ario v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 367 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 1985
The action reached us in Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Comm’n, 298 Minn. 471 , (Alevizos I), where we held that a property owner had a remedy in inverse condemnation for the taking of an avigational easement.
Keenan v. International Falls-Koochiching County Airport Zoning Board 357 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Keenan v. International Falls-Koochiching County Airport Zoning Board 357 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The McShane decision drew heavily from the case of Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Comm’n, 298 Minn. 471 , (Alevizos I), which involved an inverse condemnation action by property owners as a result of airport noise and pollution.
State Ex Rel. Waste Management Board v. Bruesehoff 343 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State Ex Rel. Waste Management Board v. Bruesehoff 343 N.W.2d 292 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
298 Minn. 471, 487 , *296 Other states have used similar standards to uphold the constitutionality of statutes authorizing government bodies to enter private property to conduct preliminary surveys prior to eminent domain proceedings.
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 317 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1982
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission 317 N.W.2d 352 Minn. 1982
1 In Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, 298 Minn. 471 , (Alevizos I), this court held a class action was not appropriate.
City of Mankato v. Hilgers 313 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1981
Haeussler v. Braun 314 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1981
City of Mankato v. Hilgers 313 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1981
See Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, 298 Minn. 471
Haeussler v. Braun 314 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1981
Even where we find that the construction of sound barriers is not a proper street use, we would still reverse the trial court’s order, for the respondents did not meet the test set out by this court in Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Commission, 298 Minn. 471
McShane v. City of Faribault 292 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980
McShane v. City of Faribault 292 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1980
Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Comm’n, 298 Minn. 471
Holaway v. City of Pipestone 269 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1978
Holaway v. City of Pipestone 269 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 1978
See, Alevizos v. Metropolitan Airports Comm., 298 Minn. 471 , Kissinger v. City of Los Angeles, 161 Cal.App.2d 454 , 327 P.2d 10 (1958).
Orfield v. Housing and Redev. Auth. of St. Paul 232 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1975
Orfield v. Housing and Redev. Auth. of St. Paul 232 N.W.2d 923 Minn. 1975
298 Minn. 471, 487 , we considered the question of inverse condemnation resulting from the flight of airplanes over petitioners’ property: “The test, then, that we prescribe will give relief to any property owner who can show a direct and substantial invasion of his property rights of such a magnitude
Brooks Investment Co. v. City of Bloomington 232 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1975
Brooks Investment Co. v. City of Bloomington 232 N.W.2d 911 Minn. 1975
298 Minn. 471, 477 , we adopted the following definition of inverse condemnation : “* * * [T]he popular description of a cause of action against a governmental defendant to recover the value of property which has been taken in fact by the governmental defendant, even though no formal exercise of the po

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by