Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State, Department of Highways v. Beckey, 192 N.W.2d 441.

91 citing documents.

Nordeen v. Commissioner of Public Safety 382 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
State, Department of Highways v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483, 487
Edwards v. Commissioner of Public Safety 381 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Edwards v. Commissioner of Public Safety 381 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
52.01; State, Department of Highways, v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483, 487
Cantor v. Commissioner of Public Safety 376 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Cantor v. Commissioner of Public Safety 376 N.W.2d 530 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
citing State v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483, 487
Exsted v. Commissioner of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Exsted v. Commissioner of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State, Department of Highways v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483, 487
Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 375 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
6(3) (1984) and on State, Department of Highways v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483
Connolly v. Commissioner of Public Safety 373 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Connolly v. Commissioner of Public Safety 373 N.W.2d 352 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
52.01; see also State, Department of Highways v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483, 486-87 , -45 (1971).
Berge v. Commissioner of Public Safety 370 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Berge v. Commissioner of Public Safety 370 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State, Department of Highway v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483
Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public Safety 369 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1985
Nyflot v. Commissioner of Public Safety 369 N.W.2d 512 Minn. 1985
See State, Dept, of Highways v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483, 487
Larson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 358 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Larson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 358 N.W.2d 154 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State, Department of Highways v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483
Thorud v. Commissioner of Public Safety 349 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Thorud v. Commissioner of Public Safety 349 N.W.2d 343 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
ANALYSIS On review, factual findings are not set aside unless they are clearly erroneous, State, Dep’t of Highways v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483, 487 , “and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses,” Minn.R.Civ.P.
Butler v. Commissioner of Public Safety 348 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Butler v. Commissioner of Public Safety 348 N.W.2d 827 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State, Dept. of Highways v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483
Palbicki v. Commissioner of Public Safety 347 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Palbicki v. Commissioner of Public Safety 347 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State, Dept. of Highways v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483 , (officer’s request was confusing and misleading).
State v. Von Bank 341 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Von Bank 341 N.W.2d 894 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Indeed, our decision in State v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483 , counsels against this.” Defense counsel further asserts that defendant-driver had a constitutional right to counsel which had not been clearly waived when she was asked to submit to a breath test* The trial judge properly noted that in Prideaux v. State, 310 Minn. 405
Holtz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 340 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
Holtz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 340 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 1983
State Department of Highways v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483
State v. Gross 335 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 1983
State v. Gross 335 N.W.2d 509 Minn. 1983
Indeed, our decision in State v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483 , counsels against this.
State, Department of Public Safety v. Juncewski 308 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1981
State, Department of Public Safety v. Juncewski 308 N.W.2d 316 Minn. 1981
See, e. g., (the primary thrust of such laws “is remedial and intended to protect public safety on the highway”); State v. Mulvihill, 303 Minn. 361, 363 , (decisions restricting application of implied consent law to be narrowly construed); State v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483, 487 , (“our implied consent law is designed to aid the proper enforcement of our driving-while-under-the-influence statute”); State v. Halvorson, 288 Minn. 424, 425 , (“Its remedial purpose is to promote traffic safety.”) The Mi
Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public Safety 247 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1976
Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public Safety 247 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1976
State, Dept. of Highways, v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483
State, Department of Public Safety v. Stavaas 227 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1975
State, Department of Public Safety v. Stavaas 227 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1975
Defendant relies on our decisions in State, Department of Highways, v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483 , and State, Department of Highways, v. Lee, 292 Minn. 473 , 194 * to sustain his position that he was confused by the Miranda warning.
State, Department of Public Safety v. Lauzon 224 N.W.2d 156 Minn. 1974
State, Department of Public Safety v. Lauzon 224 N.W.2d 156 Minn. 1974
See, State, Department of Public Safety, v. Nystrom, 299 Minn. 224 , State, Department of Highways, v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483
State, Department of Public Safety v. Nystrom 217 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1974
State, Department of Public Safety v. Nystrom 217 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1974
Defendant’s second contention is that he did not refuse testing but that, even if he did, he had adequate reason for doing so, citing State, Department of Highways, v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Lee 194 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1972
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS v. Lee 194 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1972
The facts and legal issue of this case are in all material respects identical with State, Department of Highways, v. Beckey, 291 Minn. 483

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by