State v. Hopkins
Cited by
- Connor Jerome Eischens, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Abdullahi Aden Ibrahim v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Emmanuel J Woart, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. William Terrell Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State v. Neumann 262 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1978
- State v. Russell 236 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 1975
- State v. Propotnik 216 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1974
- State v. Reinke 207 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1973
- State v. Dickson 199 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1972
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Chapman v. State 282 Minn. 13
- State v. Jacobs 292 Minn. 41
- State v. Feather 288 Minn. 556
- Oksanen v. State 290 Minn. 530
Opinion text
Per Curiam. Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction for aggravated assault, upon his plea of guilty, asserting that no factual basis for his plea was disclosed and that he did not understand the nature and elements of the offense, resulting in a manifest injustice. Chapman v. State, 282 Minn. 13 , 162 N. W. 2d 698 (1968). Defendant was charged with aggravated rape, aggravated by pulling a knife to overcome the resistance of his victim. His privately retained counsel negotiated the plea of guilty to the lesser offense of aggravated *523 assault, which defendant admits he discussed with his counsel. His answers to questions by the prosecutor disclose a factual basis for the plea even though no question was specifically directed to the element of intent. State v. Jacobs, 292 Minn. 41 , 192 N. W. 2d 816 (1971). It may be presumed that his counsel informed him of the nature and elements of the offense, State v. Feather, 288 Minn. 556 , 181 N. W. 2d 478 (1970), and his understanding may additionally be assumed from the fact that he had been convicted of the same offense of aggravated assault in another county just one month earlier, Oksanen v. State, 290 Minn. 530 , 187 N. W. 2d 771 (1971). Affirmed.