Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 196 N.W.2d 619.

80 citing documents.

Shamrock Sod & Landscaping, Inc., et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Fiduciary relationships do not t ypically exist in a banking relationship unless the bank “knows or has reason to know that the customer is placing his trust and confidence in the bank and is relying on the bank so to counsel and 12 inform him.” Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank
Gary White, Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The Minnesota Supreme Court has held that “[a]s a general rule, one party to a transaction has no duty to disclose material facts to the other.” Klein v. First Edina Nat’l. Bank, 2 (Minn. 1972).
Andrew Carufel, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, (citations omitted).
Regents of the University of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See, e.g., L & H Airco, (citing the exception but rejecting it in favor of consideration of a lawyer’s ethical duty); Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 422, (citing the exception but rejecting it and considering a duty based on the confidential and fiduciary relationship between parties).
Walhof & Co., Mergers and Acquisitions, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank , 293 Minn. 418, 421, , 622 (1972).
BPG Grand Oak Building Retail Investors, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Graphic Commc’ns Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund “A” v. CVS Caremark Corp., Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 893 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sorchaga v. Ride Auto, LLC 893 N.W.2d 360 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
While a party to a transaction generally has no duty to disclose material facts to the other, “[o]ne who speaks must say enough to prevent his words from misleading the other party.” Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
Highland Bank v. Mary L. Wyatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Highland Bank v. Mary L. Wyatt Minn. Ct. App. 2015
However, a party “who speaks must say enough to prevent his words from misleading the other party.” Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A", Respondents/Cross-Appellants v. CVS Caremark Corporation, Appellants/Cross-Respondents, Coborn's Incorporated, Appellant/Cross-Respondent, … 850 N.W.2d 682 Minn. 2014
Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 802 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2011
U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 802 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2011
(citing Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421 , ).
Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC. 785 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Driscoll v. STANDARD HARDWARE, INC. 785 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
mp; Trust Co., 309 Minn, at 369, d at 652 (quotation marks omitted); see also Peterson v. Arellono, 289 Minn. 541, 542 , (sustaining finding that plaintiff was induced to purchase food-processing business by concealment of material fact that business was subject to health-department warning that food license could not be renewed); cf. Klein v. First Edina Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 422 , (concluding that absent information that bank customer was imposing trust and confidence in bank, customer failed t
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. A.P.I., Inc. 738 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421-22 , -23 (1972) (determining that evidence did not show confidential relationship between bank and its customer).
Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C. 716 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Hoyt Properties, Inc. v. Production Resource Group, L.L.C. 716 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
v. Dain Bosworth, Inc., (stating that party who chooses to speak must speak truthfully, even in absence of duty to speak); see also Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421 , (stating that, when party speaks, party must disclose sufficient information to avoid misleading another).
Berreman v. West Publishing Co. 615 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Berreman v. West Publishing Co. 615 N.W.2d 362 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
The supreme court has, however, ruled that “[o]ne who stands in a confidential or fiduciary relation to the other party to a ■ transaction must disclose material facts.” Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 420
Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 572 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Cherne Contracting Corp. v. Wausau Insurance Companies 572 N.W.2d 339 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 422 , (concluding that to establish prima facie case of fiduciary relationship, plaintiff should produce evidence that defendant should have known plaintiff was placing trust and confidence in defendant; 20 year business relationship insufficient as proof of confidential relationship).
Boubelik v. Liberty State Bank 553 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1996
Boubelik v. Liberty State Bank 553 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1996
Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Dain Bosworth Inc. 531 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Dain Bosworth Inc. 531 N.W.2d 867 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Safeco cites Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418 , and Newell v. Randall, 32 Minn. 171 , 19 N.W.
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul 499 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Burgmeier v. Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul 499 N.W.2d 43 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 422
Appletree Square I Ltd. Partnership v. Investmark, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Appletree Square I Ltd. Partnership v. Investmark, Inc. 494 N.W.2d 889 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
M.H. v. Caritas Family Services 488 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1992
M.H. v. Caritas Family Services 488 N.W.2d 282 Minn. 1992
See also Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
Matter of Boss 487 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Matter of Boss 487 N.W.2d 256 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Klein v. First Edina Nat'l Bank, 293 Minn. 418 , the court summarized circumstances where the duty to disclose material facts to another may arise; one is relevant to this case: (c) One who stands in a confidential or fiduciary relation to the other party to a transaction must disclose material facts.
Corazalla v. Quie 473 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Corazalla v. Quie 473 N.W.2d 347 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp. 446 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1989
L & H AIRCO, INC. v. Rapistan Corp. 446 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1989
The general rule is that “one party to a transaction has no duty to disclose material facts to the other.” Klein v. First Edina Nat’l Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
May v. First National Bank of Grand Forks 427 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
May v. First National Bank of Grand Forks 427 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Minnesota Timber Producers v. American Mutual Insurance, 766 F.2d 1261 , 1268 (8th Cir. 1985); see Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 422 , (to make a prima facie showing of a fiduciary relationship, evidence must indicate defendant knew or ought to have known plaintiff was placing her trust and confidence in defendant and depended on defendant to look out for her interests).
State Bank of Hamburg v. Stoeckmann 417 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State Bank of Hamburg v. Stoeckmann 417 N.W.2d 113 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
The court next instructed the jury pursuant to Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418 , : When a bank transacts business with a depositor, or other customer, it has no special duty to counsel the customer and inform him or her of every material fact relating to the transaction, including the bank's motive, if material, for participating in the transaction, unless special circumstan
Vacinek v. First National Bank of Pine City 416 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Vacinek v. First National Bank of Pine City 416 N.W.2d 795 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
Hurley v. TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. 414 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Williams v. Dow Chemical Co. 415 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hurley v. TCF Banking & Savings, F.A. 414 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 422
Williams v. Dow Chemical Co. 415 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 *28 Minn. 418, 421

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by