Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 196 N.W.2d 619.

80 citing documents.

Simonsen v. BTH PROPERTIES 410 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Simonsen v. BTH PROPERTIES 410 N.W.2d 458 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418 , discussed the circumstances under which a duty to disclose may arise: As a general rule, one party to a transaction has no duty to disclose material facts to the other.
Security State Bank of Howard Lake v. Dieltz 408 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sit v. T & M PROPERTIES 408 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sit v. T & M PROPERTIES 408 N.W.2d 182 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Klien v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
Security State Bank of Howard Lake v. Dieltz 408 N.W.2d 186 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
Norwest Bank Hastings v. Clapp 394 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Norwest Bank Hastings v. Clapp 394 N.W.2d 176 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 422
Karlstad State Bank v. Fritsche 392 N.W.2d 615 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Karlstad State Bank v. Fritsche 392 N.W.2d 615 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 422
Hommerding v. Peterson 376 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Hommerding v. Peterson 376 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
Karlstad State Bank v. Fritsche 374 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Karlstad State Bank v. Fritsche 374 N.W.2d 177 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418
MacKenzie v. Summit National Bank of St. Paul 363 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
MacKenzie v. Summit National Bank of St. Paul 363 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Bank, 293 Minn. 418 , — another disclosure case involving a bank.
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Jacobs v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Co. 352 N.W.2d 803 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
Kopperud v. Agers 312 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1981
Kopperud v. Agers 312 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1981
See Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418
Midland National Bank of Minneapolis v. Perranoski 299 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1980
Midland National Bank of Minneapolis v. Perranoski 299 N.W.2d 404 Minn. 1980
Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421
STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY v. Ogg 246 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1976
STATE DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY v. Ogg 246 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1976
Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Sjogren 244 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1976
Richfield Bank & Trust Co. v. Sjogren 244 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1976
Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 421 , this court stated: “As a general rule, one party to a transaction has no duty to disclose material facts to the other.
Stenberg v. Northwestern National Bank of Rochester 238 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1976
Stenberg v. Northwestern National Bank of Rochester 238 N.W.2d 218 Minn. 1976
See, Klein v. First Edina National Bank, 293 Minn. 418, 422
State, Department of Public Safety v. Hanson 221 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1974
State, Department of Public Safety v. Hanson 221 N.W.2d 120 Minn. 1974
However, this court said in Kaasa ( 293 Minn. 418 , ): “* * * We think that in enacting the County Court Act the legislature would have specifically referred to the subject of implied-consent proceedings if it had wished to change the procedures for license revocation under the implied-consent law.” Again, the issue is whether the implied-consent law