Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Trimble v. Hedman, 192 N.W.2d 432.

35 citing documents.

Renee Hogendorf, Respondent, vs. James J. Green, Jr., et al., Appellants Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Renee Hogendorf, Respondent, vs. James J. Green, Jr., et al., Appellants Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. B., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of: P. J. B., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 432, 440 (Minn. 1971).
Lee Ray Bolch, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
GGG, Incorporation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 432, 440 (Minn. 1971) (“The weight and credibility to be given to the opinion of an expert lies with the factfinder.
Lariat Companies, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(stating that appellate courts defer to the fact-finder’s determination of the weight and credibility of expert-witness opinions).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. M. R., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: D. M. R., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442, 456, (stating that appellate courts defer to a fact-finder’s determination of weight and credibility of expert witnesses).
State v. Reed 737 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2007
State v. Reed 737 N.W.2d 572 Minn. 2007
Trimble v. Redman, 291 Minn. 442, 444
In Re Paternity of BJH 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
A.J.S. v. M.T.H. 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
In Re Paternity of BJH 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442, 456 , (appellate courts defer to fact-finder's determination of weight and credibility of expert witnesses).
A.J.S. v. M.T.H. 573 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442, 456 , (appellate courts defer to fact-finder’s determination of weight and credibility of expert witnesses).
Matter of Welfare of JMG 376 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Welfare of JMG 376 N.W.2d 494 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442, 456
In re the Welfare of L.P.C. 367 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In re the Welfare of L.P.C. 367 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442, 456
State v. Smith 367 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1985
State v. Smith 367 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1985
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442
State v. Gortarez 686 P.2d 1224 Ariz. 1984
State v. MacK 292 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1980
State v. MacK 292 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 1980
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442 , this court held that spectograph results, or “voiceprints” meet the standard of scientific reliability necessary for admissibility under Frye .
State v. Trueman 227 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1975
State v. Trueman 227 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1975
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442 , State ex rel.
State v. Spencer 216 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1974
State v. Spencer 216 N.W.2d 131 Minn. 1974
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442, 456 , we stated that the weight and credibility to be given the opinion of an expert lies with the factfinder.
State v. Wiley 205 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1973
State v. Wiley 205 N.W.2d 667 Minn. 1973
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442
State v. Buchwald 196 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1972
State v. Buchwald 196 N.W.2d 445 Minn. 1972
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442 , 192 N. W. *81 2d 432 (1971).
State v. Otten 195 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1972
State v. Otten 195 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 1972
Trimble v. Hedman, 291 Minn. 442 , as well as State v. Senske, 291 Minn. 228, 230 , where we said: “Identification testimony need not be positive and certain; it is enough for a witness to testify that it is his opinion, belief, impression, or judgment that the defendant is the person he saw comm