Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Ehle v. Prosser, 197 N.W.2d 458.

58 citing documents.

Gandy Co. v. Freuer 313 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1981
Gandy Co. v. Freuer 313 N.W.2d 576 Minn. 1981
In Ehle v. Prosser, 293 Minn. 183 , we stated: In order to establish title by adverse possession, the disseizor must show, by clear and convincing evidence, an actual, open, hostile, continuous, and exclusive possession for the requisite period of time which, under our statute, is 15 years.
Roemer v. Eversman 304 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1981
Roemer v. Eversman 304 N.W.2d 653 Minn. 1981
In order to gain title by adverse possession, “the disseizor must show, by clear and convincing evidence, an actual, open, hostile, continuous, and exclusive possession for the requisite period of time.” Ehle v. Prosser, 293 Minn. 183, 189
Wojahn v. Johnson 297 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1980
Wojahn v. Johnson 297 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1980
Ehle v. Prosser, 293 Minn. 183 , Minn.Stat.
SSM Investments v. Siemers 291 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1980
SSM Investments v. Siemers 291 N.W.2d 383 Minn. 1980
Ehle v. Prosser, 293 Minn. 183