Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Obraske v. Woody, 199 N.W.2d 429.
-
K&S Heating, Air Conditioning & Plumbing, LLC, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
However, “[a] large fee is not necessarily an unreasonable fee.” Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 109
- United Prairie Bank-Mountain Lake v. Haugen Nutrition & Equipment, LLC 813 N.W.2d 49 Minn. 2012
- T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC 773 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2009
-
T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. v. Bahr Construction, LLC
773 N.W.2d 783
Minn. 2009
Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 109
- Stiglich Construction, Inc. v. Larson 621 N.W.2d 801 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
-
Stiglich Construction, Inc. v. Larson
621 N.W.2d 801
Minn. Ct. App. 2001
See Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 108 , (stating that costs and disbursements include an award for attorney fees).
- Automated Building Components, Inc. v. New Horizon Homes, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 826 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Automated Building Components, Inc. v. New Horizon Homes, Inc.
514 N.W.2d 826
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 108 , Richard Knutson, Inc. v. Westchester, Inc.
- Christle v. Marberg 421 N.W.2d 748 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Christle v. Marberg
421 N.W.2d 748
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
See Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 109
- Ted Murr, Inc. v. Oberg 408 N.W.2d 682 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
- Gardner v. Hatch 408 N.W.2d 879 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Ted Murr, Inc. v. Oberg
408 N.W.2d 682
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105
-
Gardner v. Hatch
408 N.W.2d 879
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 109
- Oleisky v. Midwest Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n Minneapolis 398 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
- Richard Knutson, Inc. v. Westchester, Inc. 374 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Richard Knutson, Inc. v. Westchester, Inc.
374 N.W.2d 485
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 109
- Agri Credit Corp. v. Liedman 337 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1983
-
Agri Credit Corp. v. Liedman
337 N.W.2d 384
Minn. 1983
Factors other than such schedules must also be considered by the court, as we stated in Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 109-10 , : [I]t would be helpful to the trial court, and to this court on appeal, to have, if possible, in addition to a recitation of the services performed and to be performed in the future, testimony regarding the time consumed by the attorney in performing his services or such other prob
- Hilltop Construction, Inc. v. Lou Park Apartments 324 N.W.2d 236 Minn. 1982
-
Hilltop Construction, Inc. v. Lou Park Apartments
324 N.W.2d 236
Minn. 1982
382, 385 (Minn.1979); Klingelhutz v. Grover, 306 Minn. 271, 273 , Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 109
- Asp v. O'BRIEN 277 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1979
-
Asp v. O'BRIEN
277 N.W.2d 382
Minn. 1979
Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 109
- Klingelhutz v. Grover 236 N.W.2d 610 Minn. 1975
-
Klingelhutz v. Grover
236 N.W.2d 610
Minn. 1975
Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105
- Poppler v. O'CONNOR 235 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1975
-
Poppler v. O'CONNOR
235 N.W.2d 617
Minn. 1975
Cf. Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105
- New Ulm Building Center, Inc. v. Studtmann 225 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1974
-
New Ulm Building Center, Inc. v. Studtmann
225 N.W.2d 4
Minn. 1974
Although we have indicated that the trial court may be competent to fix attorneys fees without expert testimony, Tracy v. Perkins-Tracy Printing Co. 278 Minn. 159, 169 , more recently in Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 109 , we held: “* * * [Reasonable attorneys’ fees may be awarded within the discretion of the trial judge, exercised after due consideration of the evidence presented on the question and of his own observation of services rendered.
- Vandeputte v. Soderholm 216 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 1974
-
Vandeputte v. Soderholm
216 N.W.2d 144
Minn. 1974
Plaintiff appears to answer this contention adequately when he cites the rule that the determination of the reasonable value of legal services, “involves a question of fact to be answered in the light of the peculiar circumstances of each individual case.” Meagher v. Kavli, 251 Minn. 477, 494 , see, Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105 , O’Donnell v. McGee Trucks, Inc. 294 Minn. 110
- Kittler & Hedelson v. Sheehan Properties, Inc. 203 N.W.2d 835 Minn. 1973
-
Kittler & Hedelson v. Sheehan Properties, Inc.
203 N.W.2d 835
Minn. 1973
Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105
- Amerman v. LAKELAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 203 N.W.2d 400 Minn. 1973
-
Amerman v. LAKELAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
203 N.W.2d 400
Minn. 1973
3 Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105
- O'DONNELL v. McGee Trucks, Inc. 199 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1972
-
O'DONNELL v. McGee Trucks, Inc.
199 N.W.2d 432
Minn. 1972
We stated in Obraske v. Woody, 294 Minn. 105, 109 , : “* * * [I] n cases involving the awarding of reasonable attorneys’ fees, we do not deem it to be unduly burdensome on attorneys to require them to present probative evidence to the trial court to assist it in setting the amount of the fees.