Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stenzel v. Bach, 203 N.W.2d 819.

39 citing documents.

Ty Bernard, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
But “[i]n considering whether a verdict is excessive, a comparison with previous verdicts is [generally] not justified because of the variations in facts and fluctuations in the economy.”
Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc. 621 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Myers v. Hearth Technologies, Inc. 621 N.W.2d 787 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
When considering whether a verdict is excessive, “a comparison with previous verdicts is not justified because of the variations in facts and fluctuations in the economy.” Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257, 261 , (cita *794 tion omitted).
Texas Commerce Bank v. Olson 416 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Texas Commerce Bank v. Olson 416 N.W.2d 456 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257, 260
Omlid v. Lee 391 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Omlid v. Lee 391 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257, 261
Danielson v. Johnson 366 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Danielson v. Johnson 366 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nelson at 377 , (citing Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257, 259 , ).
Zieminski v. Caauwe 354 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Zieminski v. Caauwe 354 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Advanced Training Systems, at 11 (Minn.1984) (citing Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257, 261 , ).
Hawkinson v. Geyer 352 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hawkinson v. Geyer 352 N.W.2d 784 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257
Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co. 352 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1984
Advanced Training Systems Inc. v. Caswell Equipment Co. 352 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1984
Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257, 261
Paradise v. City of Minneapolis 297 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 1980
Paradise v. City of Minneapolis 297 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 1980
Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257
Nelson v. Nelson 283 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1979
Nelson v. Nelson 283 N.W.2d 375 Minn. 1979
Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257, 259
Romanik v. Toro Co. 277 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1979
Romanik v. Toro Co. 277 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 1979
See, Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257, 261
PMH PROPERTIES v. Nichols 263 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 1978
PMH PROPERTIES v. Nichols 263 N.W.2d 799 Minn. 1978
See, also, Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257 , Jacoboski v. Prax, 290 Minn. 218
Jensen v. Peterson 264 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1978
Jensen v. Peterson 264 N.W.2d 139 Minn. 1978
In its memorandum accompanying the post trial orders the court clearly used the correct standard in denying the motion for a directed verdict, applying the rule in Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Bisbee v. Ruppert, 306 Minn. 39 , Hagen v. Swenson, 306 Minn. 527 , In re Petition of Sandt v. Hylen, 301 Minn. 475 , Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257
Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 258 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1977
Frey v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. 258 N.W.2d 782 Minn. 1977
Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257
Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc. 252 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1977
Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc. 252 N.W.2d 107 Minn. 1977
Cooper v. Friesen, 296 Minn. 160 , Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257
Snortland v. Olsonawski 238 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1976
Snortland v. Olsonawski 238 N.W.2d 215 Minn. 1976
Not every conflict in evidence gives birth to a jury question.” The same standard has been applied recently in Nicosia v. Miller, 302 Minn. 533 , and Stenzel v. Bach, *120 295 Minn. 257
Dawley v. Thisius 231 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1975
Dawley v. Thisius 231 N.W.2d 555 Minn. 1975
See, E. H. Renner & Sons, Inc. v. Primus, 295 Minn. 240 , Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257
Sullivan v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co. 231 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1975
Sullivan v. F. D. Chapman Construction Co. 231 N.W.2d 87 Minn. 1975
2 Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257
Dawydowycz v. Quady 220 N.W.2d 478 Minn. 1974
Dawydowycz v. Quady 220 N.W.2d 478 Minn. 1974
Moteberg v. Johnson, 297 Minn. 28, 35 , Stenzel v. Bach, 295 Minn. 257, 261