DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Loss, 204 N.W.2d 404.

44 citing documents.

  • State v. Stein 776 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 2010
  • State v. Tscheu 758 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 2008
  • State v. Clark 755 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 2008
  • Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
  • Becker v. Mayo Foundation 737 N.W.2d 200 Minn. 2007
    See State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271, 279 , (noting that Battered Child Syndrome was a medical diagnosis first recognized in the late 1950s and early 1960s).
  • State v. MacLennan 702 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 2005
  • State v. MacLennan 702 N.W.2d 219 Minn. 2005
    See State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271
  • State v. Bolstad 686 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 2004
  • State v. Bolstad 686 N.W.2d 531 Minn. 2004
    In such a case, the evidence “must do more than give rise to a suspicion of guilt; ‘[i]t must point unerringly to the accused’s guilt.’ ” Scharmer, d at 622 (quoting State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271, 281 ; ).
  • Bernhardt v. State 684 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 2004
  • Bernhardt v. State 684 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 2004
    We have stated, “[I]n such cases the circumstantial evidence must do more than give rise to suspicion of guilt; ‘it must point unerringly to the accused’s guilt.’ ” (quoting State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271, 281 , ).
  • State v. Stevenson 637 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
  • State v. Stevenson 637 N.W.2d 857 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
    In such cases the circumstantial evidence must do more than give rise to suspicion of guilt; “[i]t must point unerringly to the accused’s guilt.” State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271, 281 , (quotation & citation omitted).
  • State v. Wallace 558 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Wallace 558 N.W.2d 469 Minn. 1997
    See Bias, d at 486 ; State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271, 280-82 , -10 (1973) (upholding a first-degree manslaughter conviction based entirely on circumstantial evidence, and noting the improbability that the injuries could have been suffered by a 2-foot fall, as claimed by the defense); State v. Johnson, 243 Minn. 296, 297-301 , -43 (19
  • State v. Scharmer 501 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1993
  • State v. Scharmer 501 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1993
    We have said that in such cases the circumstantial evidence must do more than give rise to suspicion of guilt; “[i]t must point unerringly to the accused’s guilt.” State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271, 281 , (citation omitted).
  • State v. Danowit 497 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
  • State v. Danowit 497 N.W.2d 636 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
    fit the “battered child syndrome.” See State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271, 280 , (allowing evidence of battered child syndrome to show intent by circumstantial evidence).
  • State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
  • State v. Jurgens 424 N.W.2d 546 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
    The eventual prosecution unquestionably benefited from the supreme court’s recognition of the “battered child syndrome” in State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271
  • State v. Garden 404 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • State v. Garden 404 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    See also State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271, 280 , (battered child syndrome); Ibn-Tamas v. United States, 407 A.2d 626 (D.C.Cir.1979) (battered wife syndrome).
  • State v. Rahier 389 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • State v. Rahier 389 N.W.2d 213 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271
  • State v. Myers 359 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Myers 359 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1984
    See also State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271, 280 , (battered child syndrome); Ibn-Tamas v. United States, 407 A.2d 626 (D.C.Cir.1979) (battered wife syndrome).
  • State v. McGee 324 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Durfee 322 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Durfee 322 N.W.2d 778 Minn. 1982
    See also State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271 , McCoid, The Battered Child and Other Assaults Upon the Family: Part One, 50 Minn.L.
  • Schleret v. State 311 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1981
  • Schleret v. State 311 N.W.2d 843 Minn. 1981
    The term we have adopted to describe the offense is the “battered child syndrome.” State v. Goblirsch, 309 Minn. 401 , State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271
  • State v. Loebach 310 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
  • State v. Loebach 310 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1981
    In State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271 , the court was not directly confronted with the issue of the propriety of “battering parent” evidence, but rather with a sufficiency of the evidence question.
  • Carle v. State 257 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1977
  • Carle v. State 257 N.W.2d 544 Minn. 1977
    State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271
  • State v. Mollberg 246 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Mollberg 246 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1976
    4 State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271 , d *390 404 (1973); State v. Wiley, 295 Minn. 411 , State v. Hansen, 283 Minn. 502
  • State v. Goblirsch 246 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Goblirsch 246 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1976
    In State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271, 280 , this court recognized that, due to the fact there are rarely eyewitnesses to child abuse, it “is very difficult in these prosecutions * * * to establish the guilt of a defendant other than by circumstantial evidence.” Defendant argues that the evidence here was inadequate to suppor
  • State v. Houff 243 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Houff 243 N.W.2d 129 Minn. 1976
    State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271
  • State v. Diamond 241 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Diamond 241 N.W.2d 95 Minn. 1976
    Viewing the evidence to support the jury’s conclusion in the light most favorable to its verdict of guilt, State v. Loss, 295 Minn. 271 , we are compelled to assume that the jury believed the state’s testimony and disbelieved that which contradicted it, State v. Ellingson, 283 Minn. 208