Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Dairyland Insurance v. Implement Dealers Insurance, 199 N.W.2d 806.
- Great West Casualty Co. v. Christenson 450 N.W.2d 153 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Great West Casualty Co. v. Christenson
450 N.W.2d 153
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Implement Dealers Insurance Co., 294 Minn. 236, 244-45
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Love 447 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
-
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Love
447 N.W.2d 5
Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Implement Dealers Insurance Co., 294 Minn. 236, 244
- Magnetic Data, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 442 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 1989
-
Magnetic Data, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
442 N.W.2d 153
Minn. 1989
Co., 294 Minn. 236, 244-45 , (the language of insurance contracts “must be given its ordinary and usual meaning so as to give effect to the intention of the parties as it appears from the contract”).
- Morris v. Weiss 414 N.W.2d 485 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Morris v. Weiss
414 N.W.2d 485
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Implement Dealers Insurance Co., 294 Minn. 236, 244-45
- Merseth v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 390 N.W.2d 16 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Merseth v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.
390 N.W.2d 16
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Implement Dealers Insurance Co., 294 Minn. 236, 244-45 , (citing Dairyland).
- Benton County Agricultural Society v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co. 372 N.W.2d 383 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Benton County Agricultural Society v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co.
372 N.W.2d 383
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
*386 The supreme court has also consistently-held that “where provisions in the body of the policy conflict with an endorsement, the provision of the endorsement governs.” Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Implement Dealers Insurance Co., 294 Minn. 236, 245 , see Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656, Wyatt v. Wyatt, 239 Minn. 434, 437-38 , -76 (1953).
- Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656 355 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1984
-
Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656
355 N.W.2d 413
Minn. 1984
“[Wjhere provisions in the body of the policy conflict with an endorsement, the provision of the endorsement governs.” Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Implement Dealers Insurance Co., 294 Minn. 236, 245 , see also Wyatt v. Wyatt, 239 Minn. 434, 437-38 , -76 (1953) (no conflict between body of policy and endorsement and coverage excluded).
- Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. 353 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1984
-
Smith v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
353 N.W.2d 130
Minn. 1984
Dairyland Insurance Co. v. Implement Dealers Insurance Co., 294 Minn. 236, 244
- Bjorklund v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 306 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1981
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 269 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1978
- Western National Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 269 N.W.2d 34 Minn. 1978
- Leegaard v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co. 255 N.W.2d 819 Minn. 1977
-
Leegaard v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.
255 N.W.2d 819
Minn. 1977
Co., 294 Minn. 236 , we held that the garage liability policy involved in that case excluded coverage of garage customers where there was other valid insurance, whether primary or excess.
- Berken v. Beneficial Standard Life Insurance Co. 221 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1974
- Berken v. Beneficial Standard Life Insurance Co. 221 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 1974