Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Discipline of Bunker, 199 N.W.2d 628.

72 citing documents.

Matter of Discipline of Marshall 394 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1986
Matter of Discipline of Marshall 394 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 1986
Such failure to file violates DR 1-102(A)(6), Minnesota Code of Professional Responsibility (MCPR), and this court’s holding in In re Bunker, 294 Minn. 47
In re the Discipline of Pearson 383 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1986
In re the Discipline of Pearson 383 N.W.2d 689 Minn. 1986
In re Bunker, 294 Minn. 47
Matter of Discipline of Jones 383 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1986
Matter of Discipline of Jones 383 N.W.2d 686 Minn. 1986
This alleged conduct is charged to violate DR 1-102(A)(4), (5) and (6), Minnesota Code of Professional Responsibility (MCPR) 2 , and *688 the conditions of Jones’ court-imposed probation, and to warrant discipline under the rule of In Re Bunker, 294 Minn. 47
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Lee 334 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1983
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Lee 334 N.W.2d 163 Minn. 1983
In In re Bunker, 294 Minn. 47 , we clearly established that failure to file federal income tax is grounds for suspension or disbarment.
Matter of Larson 324 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1982
Matter of Larson 324 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 1982
citing In re Bunker, 294 Minn. 47
In Re the Discipline of Sax 321 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1982
In Re the Discipline of Sax 321 N.W.2d 902 Minn. 1982
In In re Bunker, 294 Minn. 47 , we stated that the appropriate discipline for failing to file income tax returns is either suspension or disbarment.
In Re the Discipline of Serstock 316 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 1982
In Re the Discipline of Serstock 316 N.W.2d 559 Minn. 1982
See, e.g., In re Bunker, 294 Minn. 47
In Re the Discipline of McCallum 289 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1980
In Re the Discipline of McCallum 289 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1980
In In re Bunker, 294 Minn. 47 , we said that the appropriate sanction for an attorney’s failure to file personal income tax returns is suspension or disbarment.
In Re the Discipline of Kerr 287 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1979
In Re the Discipline of Kerr 287 N.W.2d 652 Minn. 1979
We said in In re Bunker, 294 Minn. 47, 55 , that failure to pay income taxes was conduct which adversely reflected on a lawyer’s fitness to practice law and that probation in such cases would be reserved for only those situations where “extreme, extenuating circumstances” were proven.
In Re the Disbarment of Ojala 289 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1979
In Re the Disbarment of Ojala 289 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1979
Further, the referee felt that the 1969-71 delinquencies were closed questions because they have already been the subject of both state and federal disciplinary proceedings and had occurred before In re Bunker, 294 Minn. 47 , was decided.
In Re the Discipline of Bunker 269 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 1978
In Re the Discipline of Bunker 269 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 1978
Our decision in In re Discipline of Bunker, 294 Minn. 47 , placed respondent on probation for 3 years or until he paid the delinquent Federal and state tax obligations which gave rise to that disciplinary proceeding.