DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Trail v. Christian, 213 N.W.2d 618.

35 citing documents.

  • Wollan v. Jahnz 656 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
  • Wollan v. Jahnz 656 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
    See, e.g., Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101
  • State v. Robinson 572 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1997
  • State v. Robinson 572 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 1997
    (noting that the court has incorporated into prior case holdings the public policy of protecting minors from drinking alcohol); , 626 n. 13, 298 Minn. 101 , 114 n. 13 (1973) (stating that Minnesota’s prohibition against selling alcohol to minors is to protect the public).
  • VanWagner v. Mattison 533 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
  • VanWagner v. Mattison 533 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
    3 VanWagner heavily relies upon the supreme court’s decision in Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101
  • Johnson v. Kotval 369 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Johnson v. Kotval 369 N.W.2d 584 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101
  • Holmquist v. Miller 367 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1985
  • Holmquist v. Miller 367 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1985
    *471 In 1973 this court, in its decision of Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101 , allowed a common-law cause of action against a commercial vendor furnishing non-intoxicating malt liquors (3.2 beer) to minors or intoxicated persons whose subsequent tortious negligence caused injury to a third party.
  • Holmquist v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Holmquist v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101
  • McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC. 346 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1984
  • McGuire v. C & L RESTAURANT INC. 346 N.W.2d 605 Minn. 1984
    For 40 years these classifications remained unquestioned by this court until Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101 , 213 *
  • Johnson v. Moberg 334 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1983
  • Johnson v. Moberg 334 N.W.2d 411 Minn. 1983
    In Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101 , this court recognized a common-law cause of action against commercial vendors of statutorily defined nonintoxicating malt beverages who, in violation of statutory prohibition, furnish or sell to one whose tortious conduct ultimately causes personal injury or property damage.
  • Cole v. City of Spring Lake Park 314 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1982
  • Cole v. City of Spring Lake Park 314 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1982
    Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101
  • Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
  • Jones v. Fisher 309 N.W.2d 726 Minn. 1981
    § 340.95 (1980) and against Fisher, a 3.2 beer vendor, under the doctrine of Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101
  • Wegan v. Village of Lexington 309 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1981
  • Wegan v. Village of Lexington 309 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1981
    Any examination of the constitutionality of the commencement-of-suit and notice-of-claim requirements must begin with our decision in Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101
  • Robinson v. Lamott 289 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1979
  • Robinson v. Lamott 289 N.W.2d 60 Minn. 1979
    See, Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101 , Note, The Common Law Liability of Minnesota Liquor Vendors for Injuries Arising from Negligent Sales, 49 Minn.L.Rev.
  • Lewis v. Wolf 596 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
  • Blamey Ex Rel. Blamey v. Brown 270 N.W.2d 884 Minn. 1978
  • Blamey Ex Rel. Blamey v. Brown 270 N.W.2d 884 Minn. 1978
    Two cases are relevant to this consideration — Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101 , and Fitzer v. Bloom, Minn.
  • Fitzer v. Bloom 253 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1977
  • Fitzer v. Bloom 253 N.W.2d 395 Minn. 1977
    *403 Appellants’ theory is founded on an extension of the principles of Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101
  • Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis 235 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1975
  • Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis 235 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1975
    See, also, Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101 , Dart v. Pure Oil Co. 223 Minn. 526
  • Beier v. Dresbach 229 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1975
  • Beier v. Dresbach 229 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1975
    The issues on appeal are limited to the question of liability under the Civil Damage Act because of the nonretroactive application of Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101
  • Mettling v. Mulligan 225 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1975
  • Mettling v. Mulligan 225 N.W.2d 825 Minn. 1975
    See, also, Trail v. Christian, 298 Minn. 101, 103