Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thompson v. Barnes, 200 N.W.2d 921.

60 citing documents.

Daniel Brehmer, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Put differently, appellate courts can only consider “those issues which the record shows were, or had to be, presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.”
Nancy Leppink, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Advisers, Inc. , abrogated on other grounds by Onvoy, Inc. v. SHAL, LLC, Thompson v. Barnes
Ashen S. Diehl, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Butt v. Schmidt 747 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2008
Butt v. Schmidt 747 N.W.2d 566 Minn. 2008
We have stated that “a reviewing court must limit itself to a consideration of only those issues which the record shows were, or had to be, presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 536
Eason v. Independent School District No. 11 598 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Eason v. Independent School District No. 11 598 N.W.2d 414 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
665, 674 (D.Minn.1998) (no property or liberty interest in a student’s participation in extracurricular activities); Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528 , (no irreparable harm when student did not establish how denial of participation in League-sponsored athletic events would cause injury).
Behm v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc. 555 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
Behm v. John Nuveen & Co., Inc. 555 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
2 See Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 536 , (reviewing court limits itself to consideration of issues record shows “were, or had to be, presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it”); see also Waters v. Fiebelkorn, 216 Minn. 489, 495 , (“on appeal error is never presumed
Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. v. Toro Co. 519 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. v. Toro Co. 519 N.W.2d 911 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 536
Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch 502 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Bloch 502 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 533
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Casino Marketing Group, Inc. 491 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1992
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Casino Marketing Group, Inc. 491 N.W.2d 882 Minn. 1992
See Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528 , Dahlberg Bros., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 272 Minn. 264
Thiele v. Stich 425 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1988
Thiele v. Stich 425 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1988
A reviewing court must generally consider “only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court in deciding the matter before it.” Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc., see also Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528
Sunny Fresh Foods, Inc. v. Microfresh Foods Corp. 424 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Sunny Fresh Foods, Inc. v. Microfresh Foods Corp. 424 N.W.2d 309 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
App.1987), we stated: The trial court’s ruling on a motion for temporary injunction is “largely an exercise of judicial discretion.” Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 533
Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating Trust 423 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating Trust 423 N.W.2d 407 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 533
Kolles v. Ross 418 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Kolles v. Ross 418 N.W.2d 733 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc., (citing Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528 , ).
Matter of Estate of Weber 418 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Matter of Estate of Weber 418 N.W.2d 497 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 536
Oxford Development, Inc. v. County of Ramsey 417 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Oxford Development, Inc. v. County of Ramsey 417 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 533
Wilson v. Skogerboe 414 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Wilson v. Skogerboe 414 N.W.2d 521 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc., see Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 536
Lano Equipment, Inc. v. Clark Equipment Co. 399 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Lano Equipment, Inc. v. Clark Equipment Co. 399 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
II The trial court’s ruling on a motion for temporary injunction is “largely an exercise of judicial discretion.” Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 533
Lindberg v. Gebo 381 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lindberg v. Gebo 381 N.W.2d 905 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 533 , , 855 n. 1 (Minn.Ct.App.1984).
In Re Estate of Goyette 376 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Re Estate of Goyette 376 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Thayer v. American Financial Adviser, Inc., (citing Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528 , ).
Maas v. Allstate Insurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1985
Maas v. Allstate Insurance Co. 365 N.W.2d 256 Minn. 1985
Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528
Hollenkamp v. Peters 358 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Hollenkamp v. Peters 358 N.W.2d 108 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 536
Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656 355 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1984
Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656 355 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1984
Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 536
Telephone Associates Inc. v. St. Louis County Board 350 N.W.2d 398 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc. 322 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1982
Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc. 322 N.W.2d 599 Minn. 1982
Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528
Miller v. Foley 317 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1982
Miller v. Foley 317 N.W.2d 710 Minn. 1982
at 444, d at 564 ; North Central Public Service Co. v. Village of Circle Pines , 302 Minn. 53 , 60 , , 746 (1974); Thompson v. Barnes , 294 Minn. 528 , 533 , , 924 (1972).
Costley v. Caromin House, Inc. 313 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1981
Costley v. Caromin House, Inc. 313 N.W.2d 21 Minn. 1981
A trial court cannot enjoin what a party only assumes, Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 534 , or fears will be a possible result, J. F. Quest Foundry Co. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers Union, Local No. 132, 216 Minn. 436
Berggren v. Town of Duluth 304 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1981
Berggren v. Town of Duluth 304 N.W.2d 24 Minn. 1981
Thompson v. Barnes, 294 Minn. 528, 533