Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Zerby v. Warren, 210 N.W.2d 58.

46 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(stating that a defendant claiming error in a district court ’s evidentiary ruling “ has the burden of showing both the error and the prejudice resulting from the error”).
Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc. 701 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2005
Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc. 701 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 2005
See, e.g., Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134, 144 , (concluding that an indemnity agreement that seeks to relieve a party of the consequences of a violation of a public duty imposed by statute is void); 8 Richard A. Lord, Williston on Contracts § 19:19 (4th ed.1998) (stating that indemnity clauses are not upheld if they tend to promote a
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 615 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. 615 N.W.2d 397 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134, 139
Fahrendorff Ex Rel. Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 905 Minn. 1999
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 533 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1995
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 533 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 1995
Kronzer v. First National Bank of Minneapolis, 305 Minn. 415 , Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134 , Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526
VanWagner v. Mattison 533 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
VanWagner v. Mattison 533 N.W.2d 75 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
The supreme court revisited the issue in Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Doe v. Brainerd International Raceway, Inc. 514 N.W.2d 811 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134, 139
Iacona v. Schrupp 509 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Iacona v. Schrupp 509 N.W.2d 185 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134
Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. Huber 465 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1991
Lewellin Ex Rel. Heirs of Lewellin v. Huber 465 N.W.2d 62 Minn. 1991
Compare Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526, 535-40 , -62 (1947) (no absolute liability because statute prohibiting sale of adulterated kerosene was not to protect a limited class); with Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134, 140 , (violation of statute prohibiting sale of glue to minors creates absolute liability).
Lewellin Ex Rel. Lewellin v. Huber 456 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Lewellin Ex Rel. Lewellin v. Huber 456 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134, 142 , (applying this rule in an absolute liability case).
Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation 450 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1990
Tomfohr v. Mayo Foundation 450 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1990
See, Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134, 140-41 , Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526, 535
Keenan v. Hydra-Mac, Inc. 422 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Keenan v. Hydra-Mac, Inc. 422 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
482, 483 (1920) (an employer employing a minor around dangerous machinery in violation of a child labor statute could not assert contributory negligence and assumption of risk defenses); *745 Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134, 139-40 , (statutes intended to protect a limited class of persons from their own lack of judgment, inexperience, or inability to protect themselves impose “absolute liability” on persons whose violations result in injuries to members of the protected class).
Spragg v. Shuster 398 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Spragg v. Shuster 398 N.W.2d 683 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Neither party discussed the case in their brief, but we note the existence of Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134
Del E. Webb v. Superior Court of Arizona 726 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1986
Thelen Ex Rel. Thelen v. St. Cloud Hospital 379 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Thelen Ex Rel. Thelen v. St. Cloud Hospital 379 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134, 139
Holmquist v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Holmquist v. Miller 352 N.W.2d 47 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134
Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1982
Schlobohm v. Spa Petite, Inc. 326 N.W.2d 920 Minn. 1982
Though not involving an exculpatory clause, this type of activity is illustrated by a violation of a statute imposing liability for conduct such as was involved in the case of Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134
Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. Garavalia 306 N.W.2d 806 Minn. 1981
Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134 , is consistent with the comment in the Uniform Comparative Fault Act.
Hage v. Stade 304 N.W.2d 283 Minn. 1981
Hannah v. Jensen 298 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1980
Hannah v. Jensen 298 N.W.2d 52 Minn. 1980
See Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134, 139-40
Armstrong v. Mailand 284 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1979
Armstrong v. Mailand 284 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1979
Cf. Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134 , Mayes v. Byers, 214 Minn. 54 , Weber v. J. E. Barr Packing Corp., 182 Minn. 486 , 234 N.W.
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc. 260 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1977
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Thompson-Yaeger, Inc. 260 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1977
543 (1889); Dart v. Pure Oil Co., 223 Minn. 526 , Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134
Scott v. Independent School District No. 709 256 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 1977
Scott v. Independent School District No. 709 256 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 1977
Zerhy v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134
Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis 235 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1975
Kronzer v. First Nat. Bank of Minneapolis 235 N.W.2d 187 Minn. 1975
See, Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134
Trail v. Christian 213 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 1973
Trail v. Christian 213 N.W.2d 618 Minn. 1973
We recently reviewed the criteria for determining whether or not a violation of a statute should be regarded as conclusive evidence of negligence in Zerby v. Warren, 297 Minn. 134

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by