DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Roberts, 208 N.W.2d 744.

72 citing documents.

  • State v. McCullum 289 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1979
    See, e. g., State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347
  • State v. Lindsey 284 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Lindsey 284 N.W.2d 368 Minn. 1979
    824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347
  • State v. Fossen 282 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Fossen 282 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1979
    824, 828 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705, 710 (1967); see, also, State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347
  • State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
  • State v. Underwood 281 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1979
    3172 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1187 (1976); State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347 , State v. Beck, 289 Minn. 287
  • State v. Vance 254 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1977
  • State v. Vance 254 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1977
    In State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347 , we held that although a defendant initially waives his right to remain silent under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct.
  • Prideaux v. State Dept. of Public Safety 247 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 1976
  • State v. Walker 235 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Walker 235 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1975
    The same result and reasoning applied in State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347 , where the interrogating officer was allowed to testify that defendant had requested counsel when asked if he had committed the crime.
  • State, Village of New Hope v. Eric Duplessie 231 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1975
  • State, Village of New Hope v. Eric Duplessie 231 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1975
    In State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347, 353 , this court stated: “* * * Before a Federal constitutional error can be held harmless, the court must be able to declare a belief that it is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.” When the evidence of record in the present case is considered in context of that standard, there can be l
  • State v. Bradley 228 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Bradley 228 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1975
    State v. Watts, 296 Minn. 354 , State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347
  • State v. Trueman 227 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1975
  • State v. Trueman 227 N.W.2d 824 Minn. 1975
    See, State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347
  • State v. Andrews 212 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Andrews 212 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 1973
    Compare State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347
  • State v. Watts 208 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1973
  • State v. Watts 208 N.W.2d 748 Minn. 1973
    In State v. Roberts, 296 Minn. 347 , we held that testimony by the interrogating officer that the defendant had requested counsel when asked if he had committed the crime had no legitimate probative value and admission of the testimony was reversible error under the facts of that case.