Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Eldon's Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 207 N.W.2d 282.

23 citing documents.

Unbank Co. v. Dolphin Temporary Help Services, Inc. 485 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Unbank Co. v. Dolphin Temporary Help Services, Inc. 485 N.W.2d 332 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Eldon’s Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 296 Minn. 130, 138
Schluter v. United Farmers Elevator 479 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Schluter v. United Farmers Elevator 479 N.W.2d 82 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Eldon’s Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, 296 Minn. 130, 136
Trail Leasing, Inc. v. Drovers First American Bank 447 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1989
Trail Leasing, Inc. v. Drovers First American Bank 447 N.W.2d 190 Minn. 1989
See Eldon’s Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, 296 Minn. 130, 136-37 , -88 (1973).
Valley Bank of Nevada v. JER Management Corp. 719 P.2d 301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
City of Phoenix v. Great Western Bank & Trust 712 P.2d 966 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
Taves v. Griebel 363 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Taves v. Griebel 363 N.W.2d 73 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Eldon’s Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., 296 Minn. 130, 138
Town & Country State Bank of Newport v. First State Bank of St. Paul 358 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1984
Town & Country State Bank of Newport v. First State Bank of St. Paul 358 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 1984
Section 336.1-201(19) (1982) defines good faith as “honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned.” This is a subjective test, requiring “honesty of intent rather than absence of circumstances which would put an ordinarily prudent holder on inquiry.” Eldon’s Super Fresh Stores, Inc. v. Merrill Lynch, etc., 296 Minn. 130, 136
Wohlrabe v. Pownell 307 N.W.2d 478 Minn. 1981
Wohlrabe v. Pownell 307 N.W.2d 478 Minn. 1981
Eldon’s Super Fresh Stores v. Merrill Lynch, 296 Minn. 130, 136
Stewart v. Thornton 568 P.2d 414 Ariz. 1977
Leininger v. Anderson 255 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1977
Leininger v. Anderson 255 N.W.2d 22 Minn. 1977
Eldon’s Super Fresh Stores v. Merrill Lynch, 296 Minn. 130
Shaffer v. Brooklyn Park Garden Apartments 250 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1977
Shaffer v. Brooklyn Park Garden Apartments 250 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1977
336.1 — 201(19) as “honesty in fact in the conduct or transaction concerned.” This court discussed the test of good faith in Eldon’s Super Fresh Stores v. Merrill Lynch, 296 Minn. 130, 136 , : “* * * The test requires honesty of intent rather than absence of circumstances which would put an ordinarily prudent holder on inquiry in order to constitute good faith * * *.
Stewart v. Thornton 551 P.2d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
St. Cloud National Bank & Trust Co. v. Sobania Construction Co. 224 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1974
St. Cloud National Bank & Trust Co. v. Sobania Construction Co. 224 N.W.2d 746 Minn. 1974
This test was dealt with in Eldon’s Super Fresh Stores v. Merrill Lynch, 296 Minn. 130, 136 , where this court stated: “* * * In Minnesota Code Comment to § 336.1 — 201(19), 21A M.S.A.
State v. Propotnik 216 N.W.2d 637 Minn. 1974
See, State v. Reinke, 296 Minn. 501 , State v. Dickson, 294 Minn. 459 , State v. Hopkins, 293 Minn. 522 , State v. Feather, 288 Minn. 556