Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Taylor v. Steinke, 203 N.W.2d 859.
- In re the Matter of: David Allen Engh, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Mary Brown, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Jerry Wayne Cole v. Alexander Allen Wutzke 884 N.W.2d 634 Minn. 2016
-
Jerry Wayne Cole v. Alexander Allen Wutzke
884 N.W.2d 634
Minn. 2016
Although some showings may be stronger than others, see Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244, 246, the moving party must establish all four requirements for relief to be warranted.
- Steven Charles Lind v. William Guenther Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Steven Charles Lind v. William Guenther
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, e.g., Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244, 246, (“[I]t must be remembered that the goal of all litigation is to bring about judgments after trials on the merits and for this reason courts should be liberal in opening default judgments.” (quotation omitted)); (“Courts should
- Westfield Insurane Co. v. Wensmann, Inc. 840 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
Westfield Insurane Co. v. Wensmann, Inc.
840 N.W.2d 438
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Because the goal of litigation is to reach a resolution of disputes on the merits, “courts should be liberal in opening default judgments.” Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244, 246
- Kemmerer v. State Farm Insurance Companies 513 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Kemmerer v. State Farm Insurance Companies
513 N.W.2d 838
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244, 246
- Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc. 450 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-
Hovelson v. U.S. Swim & Fitness, Inc.
450 N.W.2d 137
Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244, 246
- Riemer v. Zahn 420 N.W.2d 659 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Riemer v. Zahn
420 N.W.2d 659
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Spicer v. Carefree Vacations, Inc., see also Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244, 246
- Galatovich v. Watson 412 N.W.2d 758 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Galatovich v. Watson
412 N.W.2d 758
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244 , the Minnesota Supreme Court found excusable neglect where, upon receipt of the summons and complaint, the defendant telephoned the plaintiff’s attorney and explained to plaintiff’s attorney why he thought plaintiff’s case would be unsuccessful and then hung up with the belief that he had nothi
- Bernick v. CABOOSE ENTERPRISES, INC. 395 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Bernick v. CABOOSE ENTERPRISES, INC.
395 N.W.2d 412
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244, 246 , (citation omitted).
- Spicer v. Carefree Vacations, Inc. 370 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1985
-
Spicer v. Carefree Vacations, Inc.
370 N.W.2d 424
Minn. 1985
See also Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc., Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244 , Finden v. Klaas, 268 Minn. 268 , Sommers v. Thomas, 251 Minn. 461 , In re Application of Bonley, 213 Minn. 214 , Barrie v. Northern Assurance Co., 99 Minn. 272 , 109 N.W.
- Percy v. Hofius 370 N.W.2d 490 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Percy v. Hofius
370 N.W.2d 490
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
In Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244 , the Minnesota Supreme Court stated: [T]he goal of all litigation is to bring about judgments after trials on the merits and for this reason courts should be liberal in opening default judgments.
- Grunke v. Kloskin 355 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Grunke v. Kloskin
355 N.W.2d 207
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244, 246 , (quoting Sommers v. Thomas, 251 Minn. 461, 468 , ).
- Hearne v. Waddell 341 N.W.2d 876 Minn. 1984
-
Hearne v. Waddell
341 N.W.2d 876
Minn. 1984
Moreover, the vacation of the default judgment as to the corporate defendant promotes the policy of obtaining a judgment after trial on the merits espoused in Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244
- Conley v. Downing 321 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1982
-
Conley v. Downing
321 N.W.2d 36
Minn. 1982
See Nielsen, Stock & Blackburn v. Financial Acceptance Corp., 299 Minn. 81 , Kosloski v. Jones, 295 Minn. 177 , Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244 , Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co., 237 Minn. 28 , D. McFarland & W. Keppel, supra, at 72.
- Pedersen v. Daly 238 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1976
-
Pedersen v. Daly
238 N.W.2d 620
Minn. 1976
Taylor v. Steinke, 295 Minn. 244, 246