DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Roberson v. Roberson, 206 N.W.2d 347.

78 citing documents.

  • Reed v. Christman 376 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Reed v. Christman 376 N.W.2d 742 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Although the preferred judicial practice would be to make clear and specific findings, “where the record is reasonably clear and the facts not seriously disputed, the judgment of the trial court can be upheld in the absence of trial court findings made pursuant to Rule 52.01.” Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476, 478
  • Marriage of McGaughey v. McGaughey 363 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of McGaughey v. McGaughey 363 N.W.2d 881 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476
  • Hoyt v. Brokaw 359 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Hoyt v. Brokaw 359 N.W.2d 310 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476 , 206 N.W.
  • Metropolitan Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Adams 356 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Metropolitan Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Adams 356 N.W.2d 415 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476 , Cool v. Hubbard, 293 Minn. 349
  • Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 356 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Marriage of Balogh v. Balogh 356 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Thus, and Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476 , where the court gave no explanation for its findings and the appellate court could not determine upon what basis it valued a party’s interest, the appellate court remanded for reconsideration and more specific findings.
  • Lee v. Ystebo 353 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Lee v. Ystebo 353 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    See Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476
  • Matter of Adams 352 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Matter of Adams 352 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    In civil cases, “where the record is reasonably clear and the facts not seriously disputed, the judgment of the trial court can be upheld in the absence of trial court findings[.]” Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476, 478
  • Terfehr v. Kleinfehn 352 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Terfehr v. Kleinfehn 352 N.W.2d 470 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476, 478 , (citations omitted).
  • Dillavou v. Peters 349 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Dillavou v. Peters 349 N.W.2d 610 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476
  • Marriage of Kreidler v. Kreidler 348 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Marriage of Kreidler v. Kreidler 348 N.W.2d 780 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476
  • Gulbranson v. Gulbranson 343 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Gulbranson v. Gulbranson 343 N.W.2d 715 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476
  • Rogers v. Rogers 296 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1980
  • Rogers v. Rogers 296 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1980
    By including reasonable compensation for appellant’s services in the net income calculation, Kaliher’s method ran contrary to our decision in Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476, 477 , where we stated that “attaching a value to a business by capitalizing its income ordinarily requires exclusion of the value of personal services rendered by the owner.” Kali-her’s second method, which also included a portion of the officers’ salaries in the computation of net income
  • Kruse v. Planer 288 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1979
  • Kruse v. Planer 288 N.W.2d 12 Minn. 1979
    [Citations omitted.]” Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476, 478
  • Podany v. Podany 267 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1978
  • Podany v. Podany 267 N.W.2d 500 Minn. 1978
    In the case of Roberson v. Roberson, 296 Minn. 476 , this court held that the judgment of the trial court may be upheld in the absence of findings as required in Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure, where the record reveals *503 with sufficient clarity the factual basis supporting the trial court’s decision.