Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Finn, 203 N.W.2d 114.

24 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(holding that offenses that occurred in the same general area and within minutes of each other arose from the same behavioral incident); see also State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520, 522, (noting 6 that offenses that occurred within five minutes and three miles of each other substantially occurred at the same time and place).
State v. Bookwalter 541 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1995
State v. Simon 485 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Simon 485 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Cf. State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520, 521-522
State v. Gibson 478 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1991
State v. Gibson 478 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1991
State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520
State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Thomas 352 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520
State v. Banks 331 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1983
State v. Banks 331 N.W.2d 491 Minn. 1983
: That there is a factual nature to the determination by the trial court — — is illustrated by considering the case of State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520 , where we held that the offense of driving recklessly was part of the same behavioral incident as the offense of using a vehicle without authorization where both violations occurred during a continuous and uninterrupted course of driving and the defendant drove recklessly in order to avoid poli
State v. Gilbertson 323 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1982
State v. Gilbertson 323 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1982
: That there is a factual nature to the determination by the trial court — — is illustrated by considering the case of State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520 , where we held that the offense of driving recklessly was part of the same behavioral incident as the offense of using a vehicle without authorization where both violations occurred during a continuous and uninterrupted course of driving and the defendant drove recklessly in order to avoid poli
State v. Zuehlke 320 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
State v. Zuehlke 320 N.W.2d 79 Minn. 1982
That there is a factual nature to the determination by the trial court — —is illustrated by considering the case of State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520 , where we held that the offense of driving recklessly was part of the same behavioral incident as the offense of using a vehicle without authorization where both violations occurred during a continuous and uninterrupted course of driving and the defendant drove recklessly in order to avoid poli
City of Fergus Falls v. Sporre 300 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1981
City of Fergus Falls v. Sporre 300 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1981
filed November 21,1980; State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520 , and State v. Corning, 289 Minn. 382
State v. Boley 299 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1980
State v. Boley 299 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1980
raffic offense); (held proper for trial court to sentence defendant for escape as well as for crimes [a burglary and robberies of two people] committed during the escape where the subsequent crimes were substantially separated in time and place from the crime of escape and were not necessary to the escape or to staying out of prison); and State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520 , (offense of driving recklessly was part of same behavioral incident as offense of using a vehicle without authorization where bo
State v. Sailor 257 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1977
State v. Sailor 257 N.W.2d 349 Minn. 1977
Therefore, the test to be applied in determining whether the offenses arose from a single behavioral incident is whether the offense “[arose] out of a continuing and uninterrupted course of conduct, manifesting an indivisible state of mind or coincident errors of judgment.” See, State v. Krech, supra; State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520 , State v. Kooiman, 289 Minn. 439
State v. Krech 252 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1977
State v. Krech 252 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1977
See, State v. Kooiman, 289 Minn. 439 , (nonintentional crime of criminal negligence and intentional crime of drunkenness); State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520 , (reckless driving and unauthorized use of a motor *467 vehicle).
State v. Wybierala 235 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1975
State v. Wybierala 235 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1975
Stangvik v. Tahash, 281 Minn. 353 , State v. Fleck, 281 Minn. 247 , State v. Shevchuck, 282 Minn. 182 , State v. Boucher, 286 Minn. 475 , State v. Kooiman, 289 Minn. 439 , State v. Carlson, 291 Minn. 368 , State v. Finn, 295 Minn. 520 , State v. Wheat, 296 Minn. 97