Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lange v. National Biscuit Company, 211 N.W.2d 783.

51 citing documents.

Nicholas W. Sterry v. Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC), and Correctional Officer ... 8 N.W.3d 224 Minn. 2024
Nicholas W. Sterry v. Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC), and Correctional Officer ... 8 N.W.3d 224 Minn. 2024
Fahrendorff v. N. Homes, Inc., (quoting Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co., ) (internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added).
Doe 598, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co.
Nicholas W. Sterry, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Before 1973, an employee acted within the scope of their employment “where it [was] shown that the employee’s acts were motivated by a desire to further the employer’s business.” Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co.
Jane S. Doe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
The supreme court has held that “an employer is liable fo r an assault by his employee when the source of the attack is related to the duties of th e employee and the assau lt occurs within work- related limits of time and place.” Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co.
Dering Pierson Group, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
And while an organization may be vicariously liable for its agent’s torts, Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co ., 297 Minn. 399, 404, it is not vicariously liable for negligent acts committed by its independent contractors
Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mark Schaefer v. Cargill Kitchen Solutions, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See, e.g., Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 400-01, 404, 786 (1973) (holding an assault was within the scope 16 of employment when the initial argument precipitating the assault was work related); Fahrendorff, d at 910-11 (finding a genuine issue of fact of whether an assault was w
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 757 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Siewert v. Northern States Power Co. 757 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 403 , (noting that vicarious tort liability is based on notion that companies can absorb this liability as business cost); see also Jones v. Schiek’s Cafe, 277 Minn. 273, 277 , (referring to burden on employers under workers’ com *918 pensation statutes to compens
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc. 751 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2008
See Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 403
C.B. ex rel. L.B. v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
CB Ex Rel. LB v. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
CB Ex Rel. LB v. EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See Lange v. Nat'l Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 404
C.B. ex rel. L.B. v. Evangelical Lutheran Church in America 726 N.W.2d 127 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
See Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 404
Urban v. American Legion Department of Minnesota 723 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2006
Olson v. First Church of Nazarene 661 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Olson v. First Church of Nazarene 661 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
(citing Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 404 , ).
L.M. Ex Rel. S. v. Karlson 646 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
L.M. Ex Rel. S. v. Karlson 646 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc., Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 401 , see also P.L.
Hagen v. Burmeister & Associates, Inc. 633 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2001
Hagen v. Burmeister & Associates, Inc. 633 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 2001
See Lange v. Nat’l Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 403
Hagen v. American Agency, Inc. 617 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hagen v. American Agency, Inc. 617 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Burmeister contends that the applicable test is set forth in Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399
Fahrendorff Ex Rel. Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 905 Minn. 1999
Fahrendorff Ex Rel. Fahrendorff v. North Homes, Inc. 597 N.W.2d 905 Minn. 1999
See Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 403
Hentges v. Thomford 569 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Hentges v. Thomford 569 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 404 , Pesio v. Sherman, 285 Minn. 246, 248
MINNESOTA SCHOOL BD. v. Dahl 566 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
MINNESOTA SCHOOL BD. v. Dahl 566 N.W.2d 374 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 404
P.L. v. Aubert 545 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1996
P.L. v. Aubert 545 N.W.2d 666 Minn. 1996
In Marston v. Minneapolis Clinic of Psychiatry and Neurology, Ltd., we- affirmed the two-prong test established ten years earlier in Lange v. National Biscuit Company, 297 Minn. 399 , that in order for liability to lie with the employer, “the source of the attack [must be] related to the duties of the employee and * * * [occur] within work related limits of time and place.” Id.
P.L. v. Aubert 527 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
P.L. v. Aubert 527 N.W.2d 142 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
at 309 (quoting Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 401 , ).
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Oelschlager v. Magnuson 528 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
See Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 401 , (permitting plaintiff to recover from the employer under either theory of liability).
Walker v. Scott County 518 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Walker v. Scott County 518 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 401
Employers National Insurance Co. v. Breaux 516 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
Employers National Insurance Co. v. Breaux 516 N.W.2d 188 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
See Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 403
Pluntz v. Farmington Ford-Mercury, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Pluntz v. Farmington Ford-Mercury, Inc. 470 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399
Leaon v. Washington County 397 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1986
Leaon v. Washington County 397 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1986
See Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399, 404
Marston v. Minneapolis Clinic of Psychiatry & Neurology, Ltd. 329 N.W.2d 306 Minn. 1983
Marston v. Minneapolis Clinic of Psychiatry & Neurology, Ltd. 329 N.W.2d 306 Minn. 1983
1 Appellants challenge the use of JIG II 252, arguing that it does not correctly state the rule enunciated in Lange v. National Biscuit Company, 297 Minn. 399 , (hereinafter Lange).
Edgewater Motels, Inc. v. Gatzke 277 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1979
Edgewater Motels, Inc. v. Gatzke 277 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 1979
Lange v. National Biscuit Co., 297 Minn. 399 , Laurie v. Mueller, supra.
Todd v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc. 219 N.W.2d 639 Minn. 1974