Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sullivan v. Credit River Township, 217 N.W.2d 502.

59 citing documents.

Merz v. Leitch 342 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 1984
This court remedied the lack of a notice provision in Sullivan v. Credit River Township, 299 Minn. 170, 174 , by construing the open meeting statute to require “adequate notice of the time and place of the meeting.” There we said that in our judgment, “a meeting of which the public is unaware is not [a public] meeting.
St. Cloud Newspapers, Inc. v. District 742 Community Schools 332 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1983
St. Cloud Newspapers, Inc. v. District 742 Community Schools 332 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1983
to detect improper influences,” Lindahl v. Independent School District No. 306, 270 Minn. 164, 167 , (2) “to assure the public’s right to be informed,” Channel 10, Inc. v. Independent School District No. 709, 298 Minn. 306, 313 , and (3) “to afford the public an opportunity to present its views to the board,” Sullivan v. Credit River Township, 299 Minn. 170, 175
Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of Afton 323 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1982
Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of Afton 323 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1982
In Sullivan v. Credit River Township, 299 Minn. 170 , a case instituted prior to the adoption of the above statutory penalties, we noted that the statute neither provided for enforcement nor “specified] that action taken at a meeting which is not public [should] be invalid.” Id.
Ridgewood Development Co. v. State 294 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1980
Ridgewood Development Co. v. State 294 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1980
Compare Sullivan v. Credit River Township, 299 Minn. 170 , with Hawkinson v. County of Itasca, 304 Minn. 367
Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of Itasca 258 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1977
Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of Itasca 258 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1977
Compare, Sullivan v. Credit River Township, 299 Minn. 170 , with W. H. Barber Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 221 Minn. 77