Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hirt v. State, 214 N.W.2d 778.

23 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See, e.g., Theis, d at 651 (holding that, because a defendant’s guilty plea was not accurate and was therefore invalid, withdrawal of that plea must be allowed under rule 15.05, subd ivision 1); Hirt v. State, 298 Minn. 553, 557, (“[A] defendant who can show manifest injustice is entitled 7 as a matter of right to withdraw his plea of guilty whether or not his sentence has been imposed.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[A] defendant who can show manifest injustice is entitled as a matter of right to withdraw his plea of guilty.” Hirt v. State , 298 Minn. 553, 557
State of Minnesota v. Elroy James Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Elroy James Thomas Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[A] defendant who can show manifest injustice is entitled as a matter of right to withdraw his plea of guilty.” Hirt v. State, 298 Minn. 553, 557
State of Minnesota v. Casey James Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Casey James Pederson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
To support this contention, neither of which support appellant’s position.2 Hirt involved a defendant who pleaded guilty and then sought postconviction relief alleging that his plea was not freely and voluntarily made.
State v. Theis 742 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2007
State v. Theis 742 N.W.2d 643 Minn. 2007
See Flirt v. State, 298 Minn. 553, 557 , (“[A] defendant who can show manifest injustice is entitled as a matter of right to withdraw his plea of guilty”).
Butala v. State 664 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 2003
Butala v. State 664 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 2003
The “ ‘involuntariness of a guilty plea * * * constitute[s] such a manifest injustice as to entitle a defendant to withdraw his plea.’” (quoting Hirt v. State, 298 Minn. 553, 558 , ).
Sykes v. State 578 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Sykes v. State 578 N.W.2d 807 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
The “ ‘involuntariness of a guilty plea * * * constitute^] such a manifest injustice as to entitle a defendant to withdraw his plea.’ ” (quoting Hirt v. State, 298 Minn. 553, 558 , ).
State v. Danh 516 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1994
State v. Danh 516 N.W.2d 539 Minn. 1994
We note, however, that “involuntariness of a guilty plea * * * constitute^] such a manifest injustice as to entitle a defendant to withdraw his plea.” Hirt v. State, 298 Minn. 553, 558
Saliterman v. State 443 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Saliterman v. State 443 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Hirt v. State, 298 Minn. 553, 558
Krominga v. State 311 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1981
Krominga v. State 311 N.W.2d 858 Minn. 1981
A Minnesota case supporting this analysis is Hirt v. State, 298 Minn. 553
Hirt v. State 244 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 1976
Hirt v. State 244 N.W.2d 162 Minn. 1976
In Hirt v. State, 298 Minn. 553 , we considered an appeal by the state from an order granting defendant post-conviction relief on the ground that his plea was entered involuntarily.
State v. Hoaglund 240 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1976
State v. Hoaglund 240 N.W.2d 4 Minn. 1976
5 State v. Robb, 292 Minn. 409 , State v. Gustafson, 298 Minn. 200 , State v. Hirt, 298 Minn. 553 , Beaman v. State, 301 Minn. 180