Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the U. of M., 215 N.W.2d 479.
-
Michelin Properties LLC, Plaintiff,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
of Minn., (emphasis omitted).
- Robert R. Schroeder Construction, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation v. W. ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Robert R. Schroeder Construction, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation v. W. ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
- Village Homes of Grandview Square II Association, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
Lunda Construction Company, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Minn., (adopting the district court’s finding that “written not ice of claim was a condition p recedent to [appellant’s] action”).
- In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Minn., 298 Minn. 328, 334
- Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of Mankato Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Contractors Edge, Inc. v. City of Mankato
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328, d 479 (1974); 1 Philip L. Bruner & Patrick J. O’Connor, Jr., Bruner & O’Connor on Construction Law, § 4:36.50 at 284 (West Group 2002 & Supp. 2015).
- Hickman v. SAFECO Insurance Co. of America 695 N.W.2d 365 Minn. 2005
-
Hickman v. SAFECO Insurance Co. of America
695 N.W.2d 365
Minn. 2005
In Buchman Plumbing Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328, 335 , applying the First Restatement test we stated that "if the performance is directly rendered to the prom-isee, the third party who also may be benefit *371 ed is an incidental beneficiary with no right of action,” but noted in a footnote that a comment to the first Restatement of Cont
- Sterling Capital Advisors, Inc. v. Herzog 575 N.W.2d 121 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Sterling Capital Advisors, Inc. v. Herzog
575 N.W.2d 121
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
of Minn., 298 Minn. 328, 340
- 614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency 547 N.W.2d 400 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
-
614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development Agency
547 N.W.2d 400
Minn. Ct. App. 1996
of Minn., 298 Minn. 328, 333
- In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 540 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1995
- In Re Hennepin County 1986 Recycling Bond Litigation 540 N.W.2d 494 Minn. 1995
- D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co. 535 N.W.2d 671 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
-
D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc. v. Firemen's Insurance Co.
535 N.W.2d 671
Minn. Ct. App. 1995
of Minn., 298 Minn. 328, 340
- Finke v. State 521 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1994
-
Finke v. State
521 N.W.2d 371
Minn. Ct. App. 1994
of Minn., 298 Minn. 328, 337-38
- Concordia College Corp. v. Salvation Army 470 N.W.2d 542 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
-
Concordia College Corp. v. Salvation Army
470 N.W.2d 542
Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Buchman Plumbing Co. v. Regents of the University of Minn., 298 Minn. 328, 335 , (citation omitted).
- Badger Equipment Co. v. Brennan 431 N.W.2d 900 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Badger Equipment Co. v. Brennan
431 N.W.2d 900
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Buckman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328, 334-35 , -484 (1974).
- TWIN CITY FED. SAV. & LOAN v. Zimmerman 411 N.W.2d 294 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
TWIN CITY FED. SAV. & LOAN v. Zimmerman
411 N.W.2d 294
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
As stated in Buchman Plumbing Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328 , : If, by the terms of the contract, performance is directly rendered to a third-party, he is intended by the promisee to be benefited.
- Chard Realty, Inc. v. City of Shakopee 392 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Chard Realty, Inc. v. City of Shakopee
392 N.W.2d 716
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328, 337-38 , -86 (1974).
- Dufresne v. American National Bank & Trust Co. 374 N.W.2d 763 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Dufresne v. American National Bank & Trust Co.
374 N.W.2d 763
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See Northern National Bank of Bemidji v. Northern Minnesota National Bank of Duluth, 244 Minn. 202 , Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328
- Garner v. Todd 361 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Garner v. Todd
361 N.W.2d 459
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328
- Anderson v. First Northtown National Bank 361 N.W.2d 116 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Anderson v. First Northtown National Bank
361 N.W.2d 116
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328, 334-35 , -484 (1974).
- Twin City Construction Co. of Fargo v. ITT Industrial Credit Co. 358 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Twin City Construction Co. of Fargo v. ITT Industrial Credit Co.
358 N.W.2d 716
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
The pertinent inquiry is “to whom is performance to be rendered?” Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328, 335
- Blackburn v. Doubleday Broadcasting Co. 353 N.W.2d 550 Minn. 1984
-
Blackburn v. Doubleday Broadcasting Co.
353 N.W.2d 550
Minn. 1984
The trial court’s ruling was correct under the guidelines set forth by this court in Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328, 334-35 , -84 (1974), to determine whether a party may sue as a third party beneficiary.
- Julian Johnson Construction Corp. v. Parranto 352 N.W.2d 808 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Julian Johnson Construction Corp. v. Parranto
352 N.W.2d 808
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Buchman Plumbing Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328, 334-35
- Enviro-Fab, Inc. v. Blandin Paper Co. 349 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
-
Enviro-Fab, Inc. v. Blandin Paper Co.
349 N.W.2d 842
Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Buchman Plumbing Co., Inc. v. Regents of University, 298 Minn. 328 , d *848 479 (1974); Lundstrom Construction Co. v. Dygert, 254 Minn. 224
- Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc. 342 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1984
-
Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc.
342 N.W.2d 135
Minn. 1984
The parties all cite Buchman Plumbing Co. v. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 298 Minn. 328 , as setting out the controlling test or tests for a third-party contract beneficiary.
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Stream 295 N.W.2d 595 Minn. 1980
- Hafner v. Hafner 295 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1980
- Hafner v. Hafner 295 N.W.2d 567 Minn. 1980
-
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. Stream
295 N.W.2d 595
Minn. 1980
of Minn., 298 Minn. 328 , Shryock v. Mitchell Concrete Products, 87 S.D.
- Caledonia Community Hospital v. Liebenberg, Smiley, Glotter & Associates, Inc. 248 N.W.2d 279 Minn. 1976