Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Nelson, 216 N.W.2d 140.

30 citing documents.

Zoltak v. Walgreen Co. 479 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Zoltak v. Walgreen Co. 479 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
The amendment was designed to address the problem enunciated in Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438, 440 , namely, that by using the term of art “tort,” the statute seemed to arguably preclude many acts not technically “torts” but which led to in-state injury.
Marriage of Impola v. Impola 464 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Marriage of Impola v. Impola 464 N.W.2d 296 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
See Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438, 440 , (the question “is not so much whether the alleged conduct is technically a tort but, rather, whether it was of a tortious nature involving sufficient minimum contacts with the forum to allow the long-arm statute to be constitutionally applied”).
Brown County Family Service Center v. Kahoun 427 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Brown County Family Service Center v. Kahoun 427 N.W.2d 20 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438
Sherburne County Social Sevices Ex Rel. Pouliot v. Kennedy 426 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1988
Sherburne County Social Sevices Ex Rel. Pouliot v. Kennedy 426 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1988
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438 , ).
SHERBURNE CTY. SOC. SERV. v. Kennedy 409 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
SHERBURNE CTY. SOC. SERV. v. Kennedy 409 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438 , ).
Sherburne County Social Services ex rel. Pouliot v. Kennedy 409 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Sherburne County Social Services ex rel. Pouliot v. Kennedy 409 N.W.2d 907 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438 , ).
State v. Hartling 360 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Hartling 360 N.W.2d 439 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438
Schanno Transportation, Inc. v. Smith 312 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1981
Schanno Transportation, Inc. v. Smith 312 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 1981
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438 , and Ellwein v. Sun-Rise, Inc., 295 Minn. 109
Bjordahl v. Bjordahl 308 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 1981
Bjordahl v. Bjordahl 308 N.W.2d 817 Minn. 1981
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438 , would seem to permit us to consider nonsupport “an act outside the state causing injury or damage inside the state.” Minn.Stat.
Wendt Ex Rel. Geiser v. County of Osceola 289 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1979
Wendt Ex Rel. Geiser v. County of Osceola 289 N.W.2d 67 Minn. 1979
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438 , Ellwein v. Sun-Rise, Inc., 295 Minn. 109
Howells v. McKibben 281 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1979
Howells v. McKibben 281 N.W.2d 154 Minn. 1979
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438 , this court held that a cause of action for paternity is based in “tort” and thus is within the intended scope of § 543.19.
Smith v. Bailen 258 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1977
Smith v. Bailen 258 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 1977
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438 , State v. Sax, 231 Minn. 1 , State v. Worthingham, 23 Minn. 528 (1877).
Anderson v. Luitjens 247 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1976
Anderson v. Luitjens 247 N.W.2d 913 Minn. 1976
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438, 441 , construing the meaning of the word “tort” as contained in § 543.19, subd.
Savchuk v. Randal Rush 245 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1976
Savchuk v. Randal Rush 245 N.W.2d 624 Minn. 1976
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438 , Franklin Mfg.
Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis. 240 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1976
Hardrives, Inc. v. City of LaCrosse, Wis. 240 N.W.2d 814 Minn. 1976
Nelson v. Nelson, 298 Minn. 438 , Mid-Continent Freight Lines, Inc. v. Highway Trailer Industries, Inc. 291 Minn. 251, 254 , Hunt v. Nevada State Bank, 285 Minn. 77, 96 , certiorari denied sub nom.