Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bauer, 245 N.W.2d 848.
-
State v. Gissendanner
343 N.W.2d 668
Minn. 1984
One such case is State v. Bauer, 310 Minn. 103, 122-24 , -59 (1976), which indicates that a defendant does not have a right to represent himself if he does not have the mental capacity to make an intelligent decision to represent himself.
- State v. Gorham 306 N.W.2d 123 Minn. 1981
-
State v. Gorham
306 N.W.2d 123
Minn. 1981
This court, in State v. Bauer, 310 Minn. 103, 114 , stated in reversing a conviction that: “ ...
- State v. Bauer 299 N.W.2d 493 Minn. 1980
-
State v. Bauer
299 N.W.2d 493
Minn. 1980
State v. Bauer, 310 Minn. 103
- DeGidio v. State 289 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 1980
-
DeGidio v. State
289 N.W.2d 135
Minn. 1980
836 , 15 L.Ed.2d 815 (1966); and State v. Bauer, 310 Minn. 103
- State v. Swain 269 N.W.2d 707 Minn. 1978
-
State v. Swain
269 N.W.2d 707
Minn. 1978
Defendant argues that this court’s decision in State v. Bauer, 310 Minn. 103 , mandates reversal.
- State v. Jones 266 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1978
-
State v. Jones
266 N.W.2d 706
Minn. 1978
In the first of these cases, State v. Bauer, Minn., we stated that the responsibility for assuring an adequate waiver rests with the trial court and that when the mental competency of a defendant to waive counsel comes into question “it is incumbent on the trial court, independent of the issue of competency to stand trial, to conduct further hearings or in
- Burt v. State 256 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1977
- Burt v. State 256 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1977