Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kluck, 217 N.W.2d 202.

37 citing documents.

Omar Kwabena Walford, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
at 451-52; -05, 207 (Minn. 1974) (affirming removal of defendant who declared his intention to prevent a pretrial hearing from occurring).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(quoting State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161, 170, ).
State of Minnesota v. Travis Clay Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Travis Clay Andersen Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Cf. State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161, 167, (“While the court below may not have explicitly warned defendant of the possibility of exclusion itself, there was certainly adequate warning that corrective measure would be taken if defendant’s disorderly conduct continued.”).
State v. Landa 642 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 2002
State v. Landa 642 N.W.2d 720 Minn. 2002
See, e.g., State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161, 169
State v. Gillam 629 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2001
State v. Gillam 629 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2001
State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161
Coralin v. State 377 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1985
Coralin v. State 377 N.W.2d 14 Minn. 1985
See, State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161
State v. McRae 371 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. McRae 371 N.W.2d 66 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Jones, 311 Minn. 176, 181-83 , -31 (1976); State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161, 166-68 , -07 (1974).
Coraline v. State 363 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Coraline v. State 363 N.W.2d 915 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161
State v. Eggert 358 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
State v. Eggert 358 N.W.2d 156 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Cf, State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161 , (cautionary instruction that an alibi defense is “easily contrived and hard to disprove”).
State v. Stewart 276 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1979
State v. Stewart 276 N.W.2d 51 Minn. 1979
See, also, State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161 , State v. Klinkert, 271 Minn. 548
State v. Sickels 275 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1979
State v. Sickels 275 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1979
See, State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161
State v. Grey 256 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1977
State v. Grey 256 N.W.2d 74 Minn. 1977
See, also, State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161
State v. Jones 247 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1976
State v. Jones 247 N.W.2d 427 Minn. 1976
We followed Allen in the case of State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161 , in which we found a waiver of the right to be present after the defendant engaged in boisterous conduct similar to that of the defendant in Allen.
State v. Burrington 241 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1976
State v. Burrington 241 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1976
See, State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161
State v. Florence 239 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1976
State v. Florence 239 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1976
2 State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161 , State v. Clark, 277 Minn. 502 , State v. Zirbes, 274 Minn. 288 , State ex rel.
State v. Russell 235 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1975
State v. Russell 235 N.W.2d 846 Minn. 1975
If, however, after considering all of the evidence you have a reasonable doubt whether the defendant was present at the time and place the crime was committed, you shall find him not guilty.” In a number of cases we have said that such cautionary instructions are not to be recommended — see State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161 , and cases cited therein — but defendant has not cited, and we have not found, any cases in which we have held such instructions to be prejudicial error.
State v. Van Alstine 232 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1975
State v. Van Alstine 232 N.W.2d 899 Minn. 1975
In State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161 , we approved the action of the trial court in holding a Rasmussen hearing in the middle of a trial where the prosecutor failed to disclose his intention to introduce certain evidence prior to trial and where the evidence was properly subject to a Rasmussen hearing.
State v. Walker 232 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1975
State v. Walker 232 N.W.2d 212 Minn. 1975
State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161
State v. Riley 226 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1975
State v. Riley 226 N.W.2d 907 Minn. 1975
See, State v. Kluck, 299 Minn. 161 , State v. Doust, 285 Minn. 336 , State v. Fields, 279 Minn. 374
Kirsch v. Kahn 149 N.W.2d 676 Minn. 1967