Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 216 N.W.2d 144.
-
Jonathan G. Foss, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(stating the “well-settled rule that a representation .
- RSS Fridley, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
Eric Berg, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See Vandeputte v. Soderholm , d 144, 147 (Minn. 1974) (stating that “representation or expectation as to future acts is not a sufficient basis to support an action for fraud merely because the represented act or event did not take place”).
-
Anand Kannan, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 508, Sprague, Warner & Co. v. Kempe , 74 Minn. 465, 469, 77 N.W.
- State of Minnesota v. John F. Bonner, III Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. John F. Bonner, III
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 508–09
- George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
George E. Antrim, III, PLLC v. Samar Sabri a/k/a Samar M. Tomala a/k/a Samar Meri Tomala a/k/a Samar …
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Anderson v. Hunter, Keith, Marshall & Co., see also Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 511, (“[T]he determination of the reasonable value of legal services involves a question of fact to be answered in the light of the peculiar circumstances of each individual case.” (quotation omitted)); Kittler, 295 Minn. at 236– 37, d at 839 (setting forth factors for considera
- U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 802 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 2011
-
U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
802 N.W.2d 363
Minn. 2011
Corp., 276 Minn. 116 , Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 507-508 , -47 (1974).
- Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc. 764 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 2009
-
Valspar Refinish, Inc. v. Gaylord's, Inc.
764 N.W.2d 359
Minn. 2009
Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 508
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. 616 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 2000
-
Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
616 N.W.2d 732
Minn. 2000
See Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 507-08 , see also Minn. R. Civ.
- M.N. v. D.S. 616 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Mn v. Ds 616 N.W.2d 284 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
M.N. v. D.S.
616 N.W.2d 284
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 508-09
-
Mn v. Ds
616 N.W.2d 284
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 508-09
- Stubblefield v. Gruenberg 426 N.W.2d 912 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
-
Stubblefield v. Gruenberg
426 N.W.2d 912
Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 510
- Hayes v. Northwood Panelboard Co. 415 N.W.2d 687 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Hayes v. Northwood Panelboard Co.
415 N.W.2d 687
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 508
- Kramer v. Bruns 396 N.W.2d 627 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Kramer v. Bruns
396 N.W.2d 627
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
(citing Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 508 , ).
- Benson v. Rostad 384 N.W.2d 190 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
-
Benson v. Rostad
384 N.W.2d 190
Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 508 , (citations omitted).
- Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co. 374 N.W.2d 187 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
-
Johnson Building Co. v. River Bluff Development Co.
374 N.W.2d 187
Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 508
- Agri Credit Corp. v. Liedman 337 N.W.2d 384 Minn. 1983
-
Agri Credit Corp. v. Liedman
337 N.W.2d 384
Minn. 1983
See also Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505
- State v. Clark 296 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1980
-
State v. Clark
296 N.W.2d 372
Minn. 1980
Paul v. Jackson, 298 Minn. 505
- Dvorak v. Maring 285 N.W.2d 675 Minn. 1979
-
Dvorak v. Maring
285 N.W.2d 675
Minn. 1979
See Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505
- Northwestern State Bank of Luverne v. Gangestad 289 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 1979
-
Northwestern State Bank of Luverne v. Gangestad
289 N.W.2d 449
Minn. 1979
Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505 , Belisle v. Southdaie Realty Co., 283 Minn. 537
- Control Data Corp. v. Garrison 233 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 1975
-
Control Data Corp. v. Garrison
233 N.W.2d 740
Minn. 1975
Corp. 276 Minn. 116, 117 , Vandeputte v. Soderholm, 298 Minn. 505, 508 , Hanson v. Ford Motor Co. 278 F. 2d 586, 591 (8 Cir. 1960); Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp. 298 F. Supp. 115, 125 , affirmed, 444 F. 2d 169 (8 Cir. 1971).